’60s Scoop survivors say Ottawa reneging
Court ruling called for group settlement, but Liberals fighting for individual accounting
Survivors of the ’60s Scoop accuse the federal Liberal government of opting for further hardball litigation, despite losing a bitterly fought legal battle, as a way to avoid paying compensation to thousands who were taken from reserves in Ontario as children and placed with non-native families.
Even though federal Indigenous Affairs Minister Carolyn Bennett has admitted Canada wronged the Aboriginal children and said she wanted a settlement, Justice Department lawyers appear to be on a different path.
Documents obtained by The Canadian Press indicate federal lawyers are fighting an attempt to move into a damages phase after Superior Court Justice Edward Belobaba ruled in February that Canada had breached its “duty of care” to the children.
The decision had prompted Bennett to say the government would “absolutely” not appeal and would try to resolve the issue.
But a day after a May 11 meeting to start hammering out details, according to those present, a government lawyer argued Belobaba had not found the government liable for the harm suffered by thousands of on-reserve children who lost contact with their roots after placement in non-Aboriginal homes.
Belobaba asked for a written explanation on the issue, which was provided late last week.
“The court and the parties always contemplated that class identification, causation, damages and quantum of damages would have to be determined individually,” the government lawyers said in a memo to the judge. The summary-judgment decision does not establish liability — the claim is pleaded in negligence — and while duty of care and breach have been established on behalf of the class, causation in fact and damages still need to be proven individually.”
As well, Ottawa insists there’s “no evidence” of how many people are involved and deciding on a total amount of damages is impossible.
Ahead of a hearing with Belobaba scheduled for Wednesday, a lawyer for the plaintiffs in the case called the government’s position “mean and cruel.”
“With the Conservative government, we got an abject ‘forget it, get lost’,” Jeffery Wilson said. “With the Liberal government, we got talk of reconciliation (but) instead we get this.”
Wilson, who represents lead plaintiff Chief Marcia Brown Martel, accused Ottawa of rendering Belobaba’s ruling meaningless by essentially pushing for thousands of individual trials. Canada, he said, was undoing the spirit of reconciliation by indicating it would litigate to the very end.
A senior Bennett spokesperson denied the government was trying to back-pedal on its admission of culpability or obligation to compensate the Scoop victims. Nor is there an attempt at a backdoor appeal of Belobaba’s ruling, he said.
“The government admits there is a liability, but determining what that amount is means you need to look at what the individual experience was,” James Fitz-Morris said from Ottawa.
“We’re saying that we need to hear from individuals as to what was the range of harm that was done to them, and not rearguing that there was harm.”
At the same time, Fitz-Morris said, the government was committed to pursuing an out-of-court settlement with all ’60s Scoop victims across Canada. About 18 other class actions have been filed.