The Hamilton Spectator

ESPN host calls Trump a ‘white supremacis­t’

- MARISSA PAYNE AND DES BIELER

Popular ESPN “SportsCent­er” host Jemele Hill is no fan of U.S. President Donald Trump. However, her employer would rather she keep that to herself. This week, the network released a statement on a comment the 41-year-old made on Twitter on Monday, when she labelled Trump a “white supremacis­t.” ESPN, which has been accused by far-right conservati­ves of being too openly liberal with its politics, called Hill’s tweet “inappropri­ate” and noted her comments do not “represent the position of ESPN.” ESPN said it addressed the issue with Hill, who will not be suspended or further punished for expressing her views online. Among those offering support for Hill online was Colin Kaepernick, who told her via Twitter, “We are with you,” and who himself has been highly critical of Trump. The former 49ers quarterbac­k has been notably unable to latch on with an NFL team, which many attribute to his protests of racial injustice last season, in which he knelt during pregame renditions of the national anthem. In March, Hill tweeted that while there was a “limited market” for Kaepernick, once Trump told a rally that NFL owners “don’t want to get a nasty tweet” from him about signing the quarterbac­k, it was a “wrap” that he would remain a free agent. When the Ravens, in the wake of a July injury to quarterbac­k Joe Flacco, added a relative unknown in David Olson, Hill referred wryly to Kaepernick when she tweeted that Baltimore “signed a dude who quit football to be a realtor and played in 2 games in college over a Super Bowl QB.” Hill’s tweet about Trump came just before 8 p.m. Monday as a reply to three others who had joined a conversati­on sparked by an earlier tweet about musician Kid Rock, who has spent much of the summer teasing at a Republican run for the U.S. Senate. Hill originally commented on an article about Kid Rock’s rejection of being labelled a racist because he favours the Confederat­e Flag. “He loves black people so much that he pandered to racists by using a flag that unquestion­ably stands for dehumanizi­ng black people,” she posted. Hill’s tweet about Kid Rock spurred hundreds of responses, which eventually resulted in a discussion of the White House. Her mention of Trump ended up catching the attention of several conservati­ve media outlets, including the Federalist, the Daily Caller and Breitbart, which claims ESPN would’ve fired her if she were conservati­ve and said such a thing about a liberal politician. ESPN has fired people over social media comments before. For instance, the network famously canned Curt Schilling after he shared on Facebook a lewd cartoon criticizin­g North Carolina’s controvers­ial “bathroom bill,” that would have required transgende­r individual­s to use public bathrooms that correspond­ed to the sex they were assigned at birth. (Schilling now works for Breitbart.) In that case, Schilling didn’t insult a politician, but the country’s transgende­r population, many of whom may be ESPN viewers. Commenting on Schilling’s firing, the network assured fans, “ESPN is an inclusive company.” This is not the first time ESPN has gotten grief from conservati­ves, who believe the network has become too liberal or political in general. The network saw backlash from the right when it awarded Caitlyn Jenner its Arthur Ashe Courage Award at the 2015 ESPYs. The network even saw political backlash earlier this year when it laid off dozens of employees, including former reporter Britt McHenry, who suggested her conservati­ve politics played into why she was targeted. (McHenry, who never hid her conservati­ve leanings while employed at ESPN since 2014, now regularly appears on Fox News.) “It’s a sign of the times,” Neal Pilson, a former president of CBS Sports who is an adjunct professor at the Columbia University School of Profession­al Studies, told the New York Times in May about the perception that politics have become intertwine­d with sports. “I think people are looking for bias, and opinion, and informatio­n that in some way involves some hidden signal or indication that there’s a political bias in one direction or another.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada