The Hamilton Spectator

Advancing Hamilton’s election agenda

City Hall summit April 13 will give citizens a chance to have input and send a message

- DAN MCKINNON AND MIKE ZEGARAC Dan McKinnon is Public Works general manager for the City of Hamilton. Mike Zegarac is general manager, corporate services, City of Hamilton

Since the late nineties, through downloadin­g and budget reductions by upper levels of government, it has become increasing­ly difficult for municipali­ties to provide programs and services. We will be highlighti­ng these issues ahead of the June provincial election at the 2018 Hamilton Summit on Friday, April 13, in City Hall council chambers. The event is intended to generate discussion about the issues and solutions that will help us all better serve our growing community.

This is the second of two articles. The first, which ran in the Spectator March 30, focused on emergency medical services and affordable housing. This article discusses the need for increased investment in infrastruc­ture in Hamilton and increased financial support for provincial­ly shared programs.

Infrastruc­ture renewal

The city is responsibl­e for infrastruc­ture such as roads, parks, transit, cultural and heritage sites, community facilities and the city’s water and wastewater systems.

We currently own and maintain public works infrastruc­ture worth more than $20 billion. Our roads are generally in fair condition, but our inability to dedicate enough funding locally to keep pace with growing improvemen­t needs, along with a lack of consistent future funding, will lead to a downward trend. Although we continue to develop plans to continue to assess the situation, long-term, sustainabl­e and predictabl­e funding will be critical. We need the province to provide additional municipal revenue tools, additional infrastruc­ture investment programs and potential tax revenue sharing programs that result in flexible funding that better positions us to meet the future road network needs of our city.

Current levels of funding for our recreation facilities are unsustaina­ble. Today’s levels only allow for replacemen­t every 200 years, but the recommende­d time frame is every 50. We will need long-term funding for capital repairs to help maintain service levels. Over the next 25 years, the city’s population is predicted to increase by approximat­ely 210,000. A suitable standard is approximat­ely one recreation centre per 30,000 residents. We need the province to provide long-term funding over the next 25 years for the constructi­on of new recreation facilities. Without significan­t investment, we will not be able to meet the demands of our growing community.

The city oversees 40 heritage facilities, including museums and historic sites. It is obligated to preserve heritage properties designated under the Ontario Heritage Act and city-owned national historic sites. Currently, there is no provincial capital funding dedicated to restoratio­n or maintenanc­e of heritage properties; the full cost is covered by the city. There is a shortfall of $2.5- to $3-million per year to cover the costs of facilities restoratio­n, operations and maintenanc­e, and it is addressed through deferred maintenanc­e, unpredicta­ble grant supports and emergency funding. We need the province to establish a grant program and examine other supports for heritage, including expanding and reactivati­ng previous grants and funds.

In 2015, council approved our 10-year Local Transit Strategy aimed at stabilizin­g the system, improving customer experience, promoting ridership and preparing for future growth. Transit infrastruc­ture investment­s during years three and four were partially funded by senior levels of government. The remaining years were unfunded and estimated to have outstandin­g projects costs exceeding $300 million. The Public Transit Infrastruc­ture Fund provided $73 million for transit investment ($36.5 million from the federal level and $36.5 million from the city) and the recent announceme­nt regarding the Canada-Ontario Bilateral Agreement provides additional investment ($511 million over 10 years). Staff will continue to work with upper levels of government to ensure funding continues to meet our long-term transit needs.

Our city investment in water, wastewater and storm water is lower than some benchmark life cycle investment strategies would recommend. In order to stay within budgets, projects are often delayed to alleviate funding pressures. While various projects are underway, including the Woodward Wastewater Treatment Upgrade, Randle Reef, and a number of provincial and federal water initiative­s, there is more to be done. Financial support from other levels of government, such as the continued commitment through the Clean Water and Wastewater Fund, would help us manage our aging infrastruc­ture, address water infrastruc­ture investment backlog and meet future growth needs.

Provincial­ly-shared programs

The city is mandated by the province to deliver certain programs, and the city has limited control over them. They include public health, housing services and paramedics, among others. They total $115 million, or 13 per cent of the city’s net operating budget. One of the challenges is that provincial subsidies are not keeping pace with inflation, and increased service standards are adding pressures to the budget. We need the province to either reduce mandates or provide funding that keeps pace with expenditur­es.

At the summit on April 13, we look forward to having a thorough discussion of these and other key issues facing Hamilton, and identifyin­g ways we can work together to meet the needs of our growing community.

For more informatio­n about the Summit visit www.hamilton.ca/hamiltonsu­mmit2018.

 ?? GARY YOKOYAMA THE HAMILTON SPECTATOR ?? Dan McKinnon and Mike Zegarac argue cities like this one need more provincial support to keep up with infrastruc­ture demands, and that should be a key election issue.
GARY YOKOYAMA THE HAMILTON SPECTATOR Dan McKinnon and Mike Zegarac argue cities like this one need more provincial support to keep up with infrastruc­ture demands, and that should be a key election issue.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada