A tale of three presidents — and jail
No system devised by human beings is invulnerable to manipulation
Presidents and prime ministers who start wars still don’t go to jail, but in democratic countries it is getting common to see presidents facing jail for corruption. In fact, we have had three since last Friday.
In South Korea, former president Park Geun-hye was sentenced to 24 years in prison and fined $17 million on Friday for bribery, extortion, abuse of power and other offences. She is guilty as charged, but she is also a victim.
On Saturday, former South African president Jacob Zuma appeared in a Durban court to face corruption charges over a $2.5 billion arms deal soon after his own party forced him to resign a year before his term ended.
Since Zuma’s former financial adviser has already served jail time on identical charges, his chances of a happy retirement seem rather slim.
And on Sunday former Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, universally known as “Lula,” began serving a 12-year jail term for corruption. However, he’s probably not guilty of anything that would justify his imprisonment.
Running a country is clearly a high-risk job, and the people who get the job tend to be risk-takers. Not all of them are rich, and they are exposed to many temptations. Nevertheless, not all cases of corruption are about simple self-enrichment.
Ex-president Park’s was not, although she collected at least $35 million in bribes from major Korean companies including Samsung and the giant retailer Lotte.
But Park Geun-hye was doing it all at the behest of her confidante, Choi Soon-sil, the daughter of a preacher and cult leader who won the trust of Park’s father more than 40 years ago.
In 2013 Park Geun-hye was elected
to the presidency, but Choi Soon-sil’s influence never weakened. The bribes that Park received while in office almost all went to foundations controlled by Choi. Both women have gone to jail, and both deserved to, but Park was as much a victim as a villain.
Jacob Zuma’s is a simpler story. He was a major figure in the African National Congress during the decades of struggle against apartheid, first in prison on Robben Island and then in exile as the ANC’s head of military intelligence.
But Zuma had no money, and when he got political power in post-apartheid South Africa he set about to remedy that problem. There has never been any real doubt that he benefited enormously from the arms purchase deal, and he was forced to resign the deputy presidency in 2005 — but after he was elected as leader of the ANC in 2007 he managed to get the charges dropped.
By 2009 he was the president of South Africa, and for the next nine years the charges remained in abeyance.
When he was forced out of office two months ago for further brazen acts of corruption and for general economic mismanagement of the country, the charges were resurrected
almost instantly, and now he faces a world of woe.
And Lula? There probably was no crime in the first place.
Brazil is going through an enormous corruption scandal and more than half the members of Congress face charges, but so long as they control Congress and the presidency they can probably stave them off. An election is due in October, however, and Lula would probably win it — if he were not in prison.
The crime he is charged with is petty by Brazilian standards: Accepting free renovation work.
His judgment may have been clouded at the time, because he was fighting cancer, but in any case he was no longer in office and unable to do any political favours in return.
He still has an appeal working its way up through the courts, but it’s unlikely to set him free.
The real reason he is in jail is to keep him from contesting the election, so there he will stay.
The rule of law is an excellent thing, but no system devised by human beings is invulnerable to manipulation by other human beings.