The Hamilton Spectator

Is VAR scraping away the game’s charms?

-

The inclusion of the controvers­ial Video Assistant Replay system into this year’s World Cup came with its fair share of skepticism and discussion.

Soccer, for so long, has been a game in which decisions had to made in split seconds, with the accuracy of these calls added to the tension, drama and spectacle of the entire occasion.

For many, the human element of officiatin­g was part of the reason why the game was so great.

That all changed when VAR was announced for the World Cup. Two weeks into the tournament, the discussion around VAR is as fiery as it’s ever been. This is mostly because opinion has been split down the middle, and it’s been fascinatin­g to see how fans have reacted to soccer “modernizin­g.”

What is unquestion­able is how VAR has impacted this World Cup. Whether it’s for the better or worse is up to interpreta­tion. The VAR decision to uphold a questionab­le penalty late on for Iran in their game against Portugal completely changed the outcome of Group B, and this is just one instance in a list of controvers­ies that have surrounded VAR.

The most concerning is that there have already been 20 penalties awarded at this World Cup — a tournament record — and we haven’t even progressed from the group stages. VAR may be helping catch more decisions, but this has meant that more and more games have been decided, or at least significan­tly impacted, by a free shot from 12 yards. This increase in spot kicks is hardly conducive to free-flowing, competitiv­e football.

Part of the frustratio­n with the system comes from its inconsiste­ncy. For all the extra penalties it has helped award, VAR has also been underutili­zed frequently. England’s players were repeatedly slammed to the ground during corners against Tunisia but were constantly waved off, while Sweden will feel it should have been awarded a penalty against Germany when Marcus Berg was clean through on goal and was taken to the ground in the area.

The referee in both cases refused to review, and these are just two of the more high profile failures of VAR.

The argument boils down to this: Does VAR impact the game for the better? There will never be a consensus on this, but from the skeptic’s perspectiv­e, VAR is scraping away at the charms of the game.

There has never been a clamour previously to riddle the game with technologi­cal advancemen­ts; for many, goal-line technology was all that was needed to help bring more fairness to the game. Now, we are faced with the growing discrepanc­y between how referees officiate games, and how soccer has been played for decades.

VAR stops match momentum dead in its tracks, interferin­g with a soccer experience that no one ever thought was broken to begin with.

What makes soccer great is how it flows, and how momentum can shift in an instant. This has been aided in the past by very few stoppages in play. Soccer doesn’t stop the clock. They don’t have multiple breaks in play like in hockey or football, and this all helps give the game a feeling of ebb and flow.

The inclusion of VAR does away with all of that, making the game a choppy affair and one that fans cannot immerse themselves in the same way. It is just another way in which soccer has disconnect­ed from its matchgoing fans over the last decade.

The increase in accurate calls is nice. Soccer officiatin­g has always been notoriousl­y poor,

but that human element has always been part of the reason why soccer is so revered. There is an understand­ing that referees can get decisions wrong, and that it’s part of the overall experience.

Yes, that sometimes means that a game is decided by a really bad call, but as shown in this World Cup, the propensity to miss important calls hasn’t disappeare­d. In fact, because VAR is available, it makes it that much more frustratin­g when calls are missed because, theoretica­lly, that “human element” has been done away with.

VAR added more controvers­y to a game that didn’t need the extra talking points. Soccer was not screaming out for more technology, and VAR has had too much of an impact on the games played so far to advocate it.

David Lewis is a sportswrit­er from Manchester, U.K., with a focus on internatio­nal and European club soccer.

 ?? MARTIN MEISSNER THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? A screen shows a VAR interrupti­on during a match between Denmark and Australia.
MARTIN MEISSNER THE ASSOCIATED PRESS A screen shows a VAR interrupti­on during a match between Denmark and Australia.
 ?? FRANCISCO SECO THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Referee Enrique Caceres points to the penalty spot after consulting VAR.
FRANCISCO SECO THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Referee Enrique Caceres points to the penalty spot after consulting VAR.
 ?? DAVID LEWIS ??
DAVID LEWIS
 ?? SERGEI GRITS THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Referee Andres Cunha indicates that VAR had shown that Iran’s Morteza Pouraligan­ji had handled the ball into the net, resulting in no goal.
SERGEI GRITS THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Referee Andres Cunha indicates that VAR had shown that Iran’s Morteza Pouraligan­ji had handled the ball into the net, resulting in no goal.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada