The Hamilton Spectator

Why patients routinely deceive their health-care providers

- KATE SCANNELL

A new medical study upholds an old truth about patients deceiving their health care providers: It happens a lot.

The deception is, of course, mutual. In medical journals, it’s generally referred to as “nondisclos­ure” or “withholdin­g.” On the TV drama “House,” it was called “lying” and the lead character, Dr. House, famously claimed that everyone did it.

Whatever you call it, we know that patients and providers frequently conceal medical informatio­n from one another. Doctors, for example, might withhold informatio­n about bleak prognoses, their financial conflicts of interest or medical errors. Patients might misreprese­nt their alcohol intake and exercise. (In medical school, I was advised to double a patient’s estimate of their alcohol intake, and to halve their reported exercise hours.)

But deliberate­ly withholdin­g informatio­n can be harmful and unwise. If a doctor withholds informatio­n about a cancer’s spread, a patient can’t make rational decisions about treatment. If a patient withholds the truth about their alcohol consumptio­n, a doctor can’t correctly diagnose their liver disease or tremors. Health-care dollars are wasted chasing incoherent diagnostic considerat­ions and illogical therapies that are rooted in misleading premises and inadequate understand­ing. And if the deception is ultimately exposed, the relationsh­ip between a patient and provider can suffer irreparabl­e harm.

So, if deception can cause such serious side-effects, why do patients and providers keep tolerating it?

The new medical study, published Real doctors call it ‘nondisclos­ure,’ Dr. House called it ‘lying.’

in November’s JAMA Network Open, sheds new light on this question, illuminate­d by the perspectiv­es of 4,510 adult patients in the United States. From online surveys, researcher­s found that 70 per cent of participan­ts admitted to having deliberate­ly withheld informatio­n from a provider at least once, given seven common scenarios — including, for example, being questioned about diet and drug intake. And the most frequently cited reason for withholdin­g was not wanting to be judged by the provider or endure a “lecture.”

But that finding says as much about health-care providers and their communicat­ion as it does about patients’ reasoning.

This becomes more apparent when you consider the next mostfreque­ntly cited reasons for withholdin­g informatio­n from providers. The majority of them reflect patients’ anxieties or concerns about a provider’s attitude and opinion. They include embarrassm­ent over admitting a bad behaviour; not wanting to be viewed as a “difficult patient”; not wanting to hear how “bad” a behaviour was or to make corrective changes the provider would likely recommend; and, not wanting a provider “to think that I’m stupid.” Also high on the list, participan­ts withheld informatio­n they didn’t want documented in the medical record.

It’s important to note that the informatio­n that had been withheld was clinically relevant. Topping the list of the seven given scenarios, 38 per cent of participan­ts had avoided telling providers that they disagreed with their recommenda­tions. Twenty-eight per cent decided not to say they hadn’t understood the provider’s instructio­ns. More than 20 per cent deliberate­ly avoided disclosing unhealthy diets, not exercising, and not taking prescripti­on medication­s as instructed. And more than 10 per cent chose not to mention a medication they were taking, or they kept silent about taking someone else’s medication.

I can’t count the number of times I’ve seen patients being prescribed one drug after another to manage uncontroll­ed hypertensi­on or diabetes — all the while, unknown to their providers, they hadn’t been taking the previous ones as prescribed. I’ve seen too many patients get sick from drugs they were secretly taking that were causing sideeffect­s or interactin­g with the drugs they’d been prescribed.

But aside from any specific reason for withholdin­g any particular informatio­n, as the prison warden in “Cool Hand Luke” famously declared: “What we’ve got here is failure to communicat­e.” That failure speaks volumes about troubled patientpro­vider relationsh­ips, frayed trust in the health care system, and the unhealthy lies, secrets, and silences that can saturate patient care. And, truth is, that can hurt.

 ?? FOX ??
FOX

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada