The Hamilton Spectator

Councillor­s want warnings of dust-cloud demos

Residentia­l demolition­s can launch dangerous particles and should be monitored

- KEVIN GONCI Kevin Gonci lives in Hamilton.

It was July 1997 when a raging fire broke out in an industrial recycling factory on Wellington Street North, plumes of smoke rose hundreds of feet into the air and could be seen as far away as Toronto and Niagara Falls.

Flakes of black ash eventually fell from the sky and the City of Hamilton declared a state of emergency as the fire lasted four days and was deemed the worst environmen­tal disaster in Canadian history.

There was a reasonable fear of long-term health impacts from the exposure to toxins and as an essential service worker who worked in proximity of the disaster over the four-day period, I had the unsettling experience of having to undergo annual health care screening for the next five years.

The demolition that took part at the former Hamilton Specialty Bar site in September 2019 and in par- ticular the experience­s of local residents have rekindled memories of my own experience and the motion brought forward during a recent City of Hamilton planning committee meeting on Feb. 2 appeared to be headed in the right direction until other members of the committee chimed in to request a “tightening of the language” which would specify industrial and commercial permits while excluding residentia­l property.

One councillor rationaliz­ed that it’s “just a house” so how could there be any risks while another councillor suggested that we needed to avoid creating a lot of “red tape” and inconvenie­nce for homeowners while using the analogy “swatting a fly with a sledgehamm­er.”

Item 11.1 on the agenda (Integratin­g Health and Environmen­tal Requiremen­ts to Demolition Permits) was raised by Ward 3 Coun. Nrinder Nann who clarified that “communitie­s deserve to feel safe and protected” and articulate­d the need for a more thorough and rigorous process for vetting and approving demolition permits with the intention of avoiding potentiall­y hazardous events.

City staff have been directed to report back to the committee on recommenda­tions for amending the current demolition permit process and specified that their investigat­ion should include fact gathering and review of current systems in other jurisdicti­ons.

In western Canada, the City of Regina (population 214,000) has a

These ‘invisible killers’ are known to cause long-term problems, such as the fatal lung cancer mesothelio­ma or brain damage in children

demolition permit process which includes commercial buildings, homes and garages in addition to specific requiremen­ts such as conducting surveys for hazardous materials in collaborat­ion with the local Environmen­tal Protection Branch.

Likewise, the City of Vancouver (population 675,218) has an establishe­d “Green Permit” program in place in which a percentage of the demolished materials are required to be recycled or reused (in exchange for tax credits) and more importantl­y strict protocols of ensuring the proper disposal of hazardous materials as well as soil remediatio­n and standards for property cleanup following a demolition. Chicago, Ill., and Detroit, Mich., have been undergoing extensive renewal and intensific­ation for several years resulting in the creation of strict building demolition standards intended to minimize the risk of exposure to hazardous materials such as lead and asbestos which can take the form of dust particles.

These “invisible killers” are known to cause long-term problems, such as the fatal lung cancer mesothelio­ma or brain damage in children and are known to spread freely during building demolition­s without a firm understand­ing of all of the long-term health consequenc­es.

Scientific research has shown that microscopi­c particles can travel in the air on an average of 120 metres away from a constructi­on site, however, by implementi­ng specific protocols and strategies can reduce the spread by as much as 90 per cent.

In addition to securing the necessary department­al approval, the recommende­d best practices include the notificati­on of adjacent neighbours by certified mail, door hangers or public announceme­nts as well as a written notificati­on to the applicable ward councillor.

Demolition strategies include using a “wet-wet” process which involves the structure being sprayed with water before, during and after the demolition process and the separation and containmen­t of identified hazardous materials.

In 2020 the City of Hamilton issued a total of 856 demolition permits of which 54 were for residentia­l properties. The proposed motion being brought forward by Coun. Nann is in the best interest of residents, however, the exclusion of residentia­l demolition permits from this proposal falls short of fully ensuring the long-term health and safety interests of our community and any staff report should include a review of best practices for residentia­l permits so members of council can make an informed decision.

 ?? ENVIRONMEN­T HAMILTON PHOTO ?? An industrial dust cloud hovers over Hamilton. Kevin Gonci argues air pollution from residentia­l demolition­s needs to be considered, as well.
ENVIRONMEN­T HAMILTON PHOTO An industrial dust cloud hovers over Hamilton. Kevin Gonci argues air pollution from residentia­l demolition­s needs to be considered, as well.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada