The Hamilton Spectator

Canada warns of ‘limitation­s’ to releasing informatio­n

March hearings will delve into meddling allegation­s

-

The federal government is warning of “very practical limitation­s” on the extent to which classified informatio­n can be made public at a commission of inquiry into foreign interferen­ce.

In a report tabled Thursday at the inquiry, federal lawyers say the public release of intelligen­ce about interferen­ce threats from China and others would risk exposing Canadian Security Intelligen­ce Service sources.

It says this is compounded by the “mosaic effect” — whereby adversarie­s track and piece together small pieces of intelligen­ce over a long period to reveal a clearer picture.

In turn, this could divulge intelligen­ce gaps, methods of operation, foreign partnershi­ps, and identities of CSIS contacts and human sources, the report says.

It warns that countries engaged in foreign interferen­ce have significan­t abilities to aggregate “big data” and use geolocatio­n informatio­n and artificial intelligen­ce to make sense of material released over a number of years.

For example, media reporting has indicated that China used such methods to dismantle the U.S. Central Intelligen­ce Agency’s human source network, costing dozens of lives, the federal document says.

The report was entered into evidence at the inquiry as intelligen­ce officials, including CSIS director David Vigneault, took part in a hearing on how the inquiry can best navigate the obstacles posed by official secrecy.

Vigneault signalled that the spy agency supports finding ways to disclose as much informatio­n as possible on the sensitive topic of foreign interferen­ce.

It is not “business as usual” when it comes to keeping a tight rein of secrecy on classified materials, he said.

The discussion­s on national security and confidenti­ality of informatio­n will help set the stage for the next public hearings, likely to take place at the end of March.

The March hearings are intended to delve into allegation­s of foreign interferen­ce by China, India, Russia and others in the 2019 and 2021 federal elections, with a report on these matters due May 3.

The federal report tabled Thursday suggests the inquiry will have challenges making a good deal of informatio­n public.

Many of the foreign interferen­ce investigat­ions that were active as long as five years ago are still active today, the report says.

The release of such informatio­n could also make Canada’s allies reluctant to share certain secrets with CSIS, the report suggests.

The inquiry has already had a chance to review several classified documents concerning foreign interferen­ce.

In a preliminar­y exercise, the inquiry asked the government to review a selection of these records with an eye to preparing them for public release.

A number of the records in question were almost entirely stripped of informatio­n by the end of the process.

“The documents at issue demonstrat­e in concrete terms one of the most difficult practical constraint­s that the inquiry will face in fulfilling its mandate,” the federal report says.

 ?? JUSTIN TANG THE CANADIAN PRESS FILE PHOTO ?? David Vigneault, director of the Canadian Security Intelligen­ce Service (seen here in June 2023), took part in the inquiry hearing Thursday. A commission wanted to hear from national security officials as it looked for ways to be more transparen­t on the highly sensitive informatio­n.
JUSTIN TANG THE CANADIAN PRESS FILE PHOTO David Vigneault, director of the Canadian Security Intelligen­ce Service (seen here in June 2023), took part in the inquiry hearing Thursday. A commission wanted to hear from national security officials as it looked for ways to be more transparen­t on the highly sensitive informatio­n.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada