NHL GMs MUST CONSIDER

the salary cap in potential deadline deals. Can the newcomer be brought in without putting the team over the cap? If not, who needs to be moved to accommodate him? How will the new player affect the team’s ability to resign key contributors in the off-season? How much can the team afford to give up for a “rental player?” Pacioretty, a UFA in 2019, has no red flags when it comes to assessing his value long-term. He’s still just 29 and has been a consistent offensive performer. He’s big and strong, his skating is fine and he has been durable. He displays enthusiasm and should make an immediate impact, especially on the power play. Kane, a UFA this summer, has significant red flags. Although he is big and strong and skates well, has offensive ability and physical power, I would be reluctant to part with much to obtain him or to commit to a long-term contract with him. His durability has not been reliable. His commitment to returning from injuries has been in question. His relationship with teammates has not always been good. His work ethic on the ice has been poor for parts of this season and erratic in the past. I don’t like using the word “character.” It has a moral tone to it. I prefer to use the word “personality.” Pacioretty has a good personality for a key player. I don’t believe Kane does. Give up what you can afford to acquire Pacioretty on the basis that you will sign him to a long-term contract. When it comes to Kane, I resort to the legal maxim caveat emptor. Let the buyer beware! Tom Thompson has been an NHL scout/director/assistant GM since 1985