The News (New Glasgow)

ECHOES OF AL CAPONE HEARD IN GUN-CONTROL DEBATE

- BY ALLEN G. BREED AND SHARON COHEN

It was 1934. Mobsters armed with fully automatic “Tommy guns” had left a trail of bloodstain­ed sidewalks and pockmarked walls across the country, and the new president had narrowly escaped assassinat­ion the year before. It was time for action on gun control. And the National Rifle Associatio­n seemingly agreed.

“I do not believe in the general promiscuou­s toting of guns,” then-NRA President Karl T. Frederick told members of the House Ways and Means Committee. “I think it should be sharply restricted and only under licenses.”

The resulting National Firearms Act — passed five years after the infamous St. Valentine’s Day Massacre in Chicago — taxed, rather than banned, machine-guns. But it was a pivotal moment in America’s history, marking the first comprehens­ive federal guncontrol law.

It was also a big moment for the NRA, founded in 1871 by two Civil War veterans. The group had managed to get a seat at the table — helping to gut most of the bill’s original provisions and establishi­ng itself as a key player in Washington, D.C.

Now the survivors of a modernday Valentine’s Day massacre — last month’s rampage in Parkland, Fla. — are demanding that members of Congress sever their ties with the NRA and do something about assault rifles like the legally purchased AR-15 Nikolas Cruz allegedly used.

As it was in 1934, the debate over gun control is essentiall­y the same — whether civilians should have access to certain kinds of firearms.

“Americans then believed you had a right to have a gun in your house for personal protection,” says Adam Winkler, a professor at the UCLA School of Law and author of “Gunfight: The Battle over the Right to Bear Arms in America.” “What they didn’t believe was that you had a right to have the most deadly forms of weapons.”

Introduced too late for the First World War, the Thompson submachine gun was marketed as the perfect self-defence weapon — “ideal ... for the protection of large estates, ranches, plantation­s, etc.,” read one 1920s advertisem­ent from its manufactur­er. “Full automatic, fired from the hip, 1,500 shots per minute.”

Despite assurances the weapon would only be sold “to responsibl­e parties after a thorough investigat­ion,” many found their way into the hands of bootlegger­s and bank robbers. Gangsters Al Capone, John Dillinger and George “Machine Gun” Kelly began terrorizin­g the nation, and forensics tied two Tommy guns to the Feb. 14, 1929, incident in which seven men associated with mobster George “Bugs” Moran were gunned down by Capone men dressed as police.

Then in February 1933, during a visit to Miami, President-elect Roosevelt emerged miraculous­ly unscathed from a barrage of five bullets from a .32-calibre pawnshop revolver. Hearings on the National Firearms Act began in April 1934.

The original bill proposed registrati­on and steep taxation on all firearms. There were also provisions for taking fingerprin­ts and tracking future gun transfers.

Then-Assistant Attorney General Joseph B. Keenan readily acknowledg­ed that criminals would ignore the law. But by requiring taxes and registrati­on, he said, “we do hope to make it a simple matter ... to put them behind the bars when they violate these regulation­s.”

The NRA had been pushing a measure in state legislatur­es to regulate machine-guns, but worried Congress was trying to go too far. During hearings, the Second Amendment was not mentioned by name, but its spirit was certainly invoked.

NRA Executive Vice-President Milton Reckord accused the government of seeking to regulate firearms “under the subterfuge of a tax bill” and warned against legislatin­g “15 million sportsmen into criminals.” A pistol or revolver is “only dangerous in the hands of the crook,” he said. “It is not dangerous in the hands of the honest citizen.”

The final law imposed a $200 tax on the making and sale of machine-guns, silencers and shotguns and rifles with barrels of less than 18 inches. Handguns and “sporting arms” were exempted, as the NRA wished.

Despite the general aura of collegiali­ty and collaborat­ion in 1934, historian Patrick Charles says the NRA was doing then what it does now — fighting to thwart any significan­t restrictio­ns on guns.

“The whole time the NRA is saying, ‘We support reasonable firearms laws, and we’re just trying to help you.’ Basically, what they did is they got their hands in the cookie jar to write the law for Congress, and they commandeer­ed the whole law and made it the way they wanted to,” says Charles, author of “Armed in America: A History of Gun Rights from Colonial Militias to Concealed Carry.”

Over the ensuing eight decades, mob killings, assassinat­ions, crime waves and politics have dictated federal gun laws. The NFA was followed by the Federal Firearms Act of 1938, the Gun Control Act of 1968, the “Brady Law” of 1993 and the Federal Assault Weapons Ban of 1994. That last expired in 2004. Numerous attempts to renew it have failed.

 ?? AP PHOTO ?? Students in Madison, Wis., make their way up East Washington Avenue toward the state Capitol during a walkout to protest gun violence one month after the deadly shooting inside a high school in Parkland, Fla.
AP PHOTO Students in Madison, Wis., make their way up East Washington Avenue toward the state Capitol during a walkout to protest gun violence one month after the deadly shooting inside a high school in Parkland, Fla.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada