The Niagara Falls Review

Dad has definite ideas of who is in the family

- AMY DICKINSON ASK AMY

Dear Amy: I have been married for 15 years. My wife and I have three children.

My in-laws are all the products of failed marriages, so there are blood relatives and step relatives to deal with on both sides of the aisle.

For years, my in-laws have told my children that my wife’s stepmother’s grandchild­ren are their cousins.

This alone is NOT true, since these kids are only involved in our lives due to marriage.

I just keep talking to my kids and explaining to them the way the family tree works, and that these kids are not their cousins.

At one point, my oldest son got mad and told one of these kids that he was not his real cousin, and then my in-laws confronted my son about what he said. They were apparently upset about it.

Amy, I am not going to create a world that does not exist. Why should I allow someone else to create and force my kids into it without consulting me first? They are stuck on taking in these kids that have zero actual blood relation to them at all.

I stand my ground on this, and my wife just thinks that I am being an ass.

Because there are no other siblings for her nor myself, she says that this is the closest to cousins that my kids will ever have in their life. Your thoughts?

— DISTURBED DAD

Dear Disturbed: I agree with your wife: you are being an ass.

Before you spend the rest of your life obsessivel­y poring over a family tree at every potluck dinner, remember that “family” isn’t some exclusive club that you get to join by having two or more of the same biological relatives.

My own family is a complex web of second marriages, step-families, adopted siblings, lifelong friends with honorary family status, (and pets).

People in highly functionin­g and inclusive families will tell you that all you have to do to be a part of any family is to be considered part of the family.

This means being included, regardless of your biological status, and reveling in relationsh­ips that are aunt-like, grandparen­t-like or cousin-like. It is wise to explain truthfully all of these many and varied relationsh­ips to your children, but to use loaded terms like “real family” only underscore­s your emotional ignorance about relationsh­ips.

Your in-laws are doing a wonderful thing accepting these children, so put down the genealogy chart and apologize.

After all, if we follow your logic, then your in-laws shouldn’t be accepting you as family either; you aren’t related to them by blood, so you aren’t their “real family.”

You say that you don’t want to create a world that doesn’t exist by embracing these family members that aren’t blood relatives.

The good news is, if you continue to treat your wife’s family this way, you won’t have to worry about keeping the blood relatives and the step-relatives in this family straight — given your lack of good manners, these family members might disregard you in favour of someone who is more open, accepting and inclusive.

Dear Readers: Sometimes people who dispense advice run out of answers. If you’ve ever been curious about the life behind my advice, read my new book, Strangers Tend to Tell Me Things: A Memoir of Love, Loss, and Coming Home (2017, Hachette). Email: askamy@tribune.com Twitter: @askingamy

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada