The Niagara Falls Review

OEB oversteppe­d

-

Re: Overriding the OEB, Letters, March 22

We appreciate the author’s perspectiv­e, but would like to provide additional informatio­n on Ontario Energy Board’s rebasing decision and its impact on Enbridge Gas customers and taxpayers.

Enbridge Gas recognizes the importance of reducing methane emissions and is committed to addressing our operationa­l emissions while supporting the transition toward a green energy future. However, it is important to note natural gas plays a critical role in Ontario’s energy mix, with 30 per cent of the energy grid relying on this energy source, at a quarter of the cost of electricit­y. A sudden and complete transition away from natural gas would be expensive.

The OEB decision sets a course to eliminate natural gas from Ontario’s energy mix. In its role as an economic regulator that serves provincial energy policy, this was an overstep in its jurisdicti­on.

Contrary to assertions, the OEB policy, EBO-188, protects existing ratepayers from costs of expanding the natural gas system and ensures costs are borne by customers who benefit from new infrastruc­ture. Bill 165 does not aim to raise heating prices for Ontarians; quite the contrary. Further, Bill 165 is not a subsidy but ensures the cost to connect is distribute­d over time.

It is important to consider the impact of OEB’s decision on families purchasing new homes, as this ruling could add up to $6,000 in upfront costs. It is critical to balance the need for affordable energy with the goal of reducing emissions.

Malini Giridhar, vice-president, business developmen­t and regulatory, Enbridge Gas Inc.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada