The Peterborough Examiner

Trump demands judicial ‘common sense’

Shrugs off Chief Justice Roberts’ defence of judges

- MARK SHERMAN AND JILL COLVIN

WASHINGTON — Incensed by a ruling against his migrant asylum policy, President Donald Trump on Thursday demanded “some common sense” from America’s judges and directed his ire at a liberal-leaning appeals court.

He professed respect for U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, with whom he is engaged in a startling public dispute over the independen­ce of the judiciary, yet shrugged off the Republican appointee as someone who “can say what he wants.”

Trump, still seething over Monday’s decision by a President Barack Obama-nominated judge, began his Thanksgivi­ng Day by asserting on Twitter that courts should defer to his administra­tion and law enforcemen­t on border security because judges “know nothing about it and are making our Country unsafe.”

The president, spending the holiday in Florida, later told reporters that law enforcers and military service members he has sent to the U.S.-Mexico border “can’t believe the decisions that are being made by these judges.”

Trump has gone after federal judges before who have ruled against him, but the current dust-up is the first time that Roberts, the leader of the federal judiciary, has offered even a hint of criticism of the president.

Roberts issued a strongly worded statement Wednesday defending judicial independen­ce and contradict­ing Trump’s claim that judges are partisans allied with the party of the president who nominated them.

It is highly unusual for a president to single out judges for personal criticism, and a chief justice’s challenge to a president’s comments is unpreceden­ted in modern times.

In challengin­g a co-equal branch of government, Trump complains that his opponents file lawsuits in courts that are part of the left-leaning 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. That’s where an appeal of the recent asylum ruling would normally go.

It’s not unusual for those challengin­g a president’s policies to sue in courts they consider likely to back their claims.

“Everybody files in the 9th Circuit,” Trump said with exaggerati­on. “I think we’re going to have stop that somehow. The judges are going to have to get together or Congress is going to have to get together and stop it, because they’re taking advantage of our country.”

Conservati­ve groups tended to bring challenges to Obama-era policies in Texas, part of the conservati­ve-leaning 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans.

“I like him and I respect him,” Trump said about Roberts, “but I think we have to use some common sense. The 9th Circuit, everybody knows that it’s totally out of control.”

Trump began the holiday by tweeting Roberts “can say what he wants, but the 9th Circuit is a complete & total disaster.”

He even raised the topic during his call to service members, saying the 9th Circuit “has become a big thorn in our side . ... It’s a terrible thing when judges take over your protective services, when they tell you how to protect the border. It’s a disgrace.”

With Roberts’ court feeling the heat over Trump’s appointmen­t of Brett Kavanaugh, Roberts and several of his judges have gone out of their way to rebut perception­s of the court as a political institutio­n divided between five conservati­ve Republican­s and four liberal Democrats.

Trump’s appointmen­ts to the Supreme Court and lower federal courts have themselves spurred charges that the courts are becoming more politicize­d. A Bush appointee, Roberts, as the justice widely seen as closest to the court’s middle, could determine the outcome of high-profile cases that split the court.

The new drama began with remarks Trump made Tuesday when he went after Jon S. Tigar, the San Francisco-based judge who had ruled against Trump’s asylum order. The president claimed, not for the first time, that the 9th Circuit was biased against him.

Roberts had refused to comment on Trump’s earlier attacks on judges, including the chief justice himself. But on Wednesday, after a query by The Associated Press, he spoke up for the independen­ce of the federal judiciary and rejected the notion that judges are loyal to the presidents who appoint them.

“We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges,” Roberts said. “What we have is an extraordin­ary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them.”

He concluded: “The independen­t judiciary is something we should all be thankful for.”

Trump responded by questionin­g the independen­ce of federal judges appointed by his predecesso­r and confirmed by the Senate. He especially criticized judges on the 9th Circuit.

“Sorry Chief Justice John Roberts, but you do indeed have ‘Obama judges,’ and they have a much different point of view than the people who are charged with the safety of our country,” the president tweeted.

The president’s remarks on Tuesday came when a reporter asked for his reaction to a ruling by Tigar that put the administra­tion’s asylum policy on hold.

“Every case that gets filed in the 9th Circuit, we get beaten,” Trump said after the Tigar ruling. “And then we end up having to go to the Supreme Court, like the travel ban, and we won.”

The 9th Circuit is by far the largest of the federal appellate courts, covering Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon and Washington.

The court has long had a majority of judges appointed by Democratic presidents, with the current breakdown at 16-7. But Trump has the opportunit­y to narrow that edge significan­tly because there are six vacancies, and he already has nominated candidates for five of them.

 ?? DREW ANGERER BLOOMBERG ?? U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts is in a rare public dispute with President Donald Trump on the independen­ce of the judiciary branch. His challenge to Trump’s comments is unpreceden­ted in modern times.
DREW ANGERER BLOOMBERG U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts is in a rare public dispute with President Donald Trump on the independen­ce of the judiciary branch. His challenge to Trump’s comments is unpreceden­ted in modern times.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada