The Peterborough Examiner

OSPCA to stop euthanizin­g dogs involved in attacks

- LIAM CASEY

Ontario’s animal welfare agency has told its frontline officers it will no longer euthanize dogs involved in attacks as required by law.

In an internal memo obtained by The Canadian Press, the Ontario Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals says inspectors and agents should hand off to police all cases in which courts have ordered the destructio­n of animals, including pit bulls, which are banned in the province.

The document, dated

Oct. 9, 2018, says euthanizin­g dogs would violate the agency’s mission, which is to provide “provincewi­de leadership on matters relating to the prevention of cruelty to animals and the promotion of animal welfare.”

“Where legislatio­n conflicts with the mission of the charity, the Ontario SPCA declines to enforce such legislatio­n,” the order reads.

The only exception will be cases when the euthanizat­ion is ordered by a veterinari­an and is “the most humane course of action for the animal,” says the order, which was handed over to enforcemen­t officers at two meetings held in late October at the agency’s headquarte­rs in Stouffvill­e, Ont., north of Toronto.

In cases involving pit bulls that do not have behavioura­l issues, the animals will be moved out of province where it’s legal to own them, rather than destroyed.

A spokeswoma­n for the OSPCA confirmed the policy change, saying the agency’s role was to protect animals’ well-being.

“If it conflicts with our mission, we’ll hand it to another agency to address,” Alison Cross said in an interview.

The OSPCA has also ordered its officers to defy a Criminal Code law that states birds found in a cockfighti­ng ring shall be destroyed on order from a judge. That, too, will be passed off to police, the agency said.

“The laws of Ontario and Canada provide that in certain circumstan­ces a court may order that an animal be euthanized,” said Brent Ross, a spokesman for the Ministry of Community Safety and Correction­al Services, which is responsibl­e for the OSPCA.

Ross said the ministry expects the OSPCA to comply with a court order that requires an animal be euthanized, adding that the agency had the right to defer to police in potentiall­y criminal matters.

The orders to defy the provincial laws have made some of the OSPCA frontline inspectors uneasy, given that they are peace officers sworn to uphold the law.

“We have to choose between doing our jobs or following management orders,” said a frontline officer who attended the October meetings.

The officer, who did not want his name used for fear of retributio­n, said the agency leaders have also ordered all cases of “blood sports” be handed over to police.

“We are not to deal with it, we would only go in a supporting role. That’s what we were told.”

The latest changes, including a decision to pull back from investigat­ing cruelty cases involving livestock and horses, are part of what the OSPCA calls a restructur­ing effort to deal with years-long funding shortage.

The policy changes, however, have received rebuke from both the province and animal activists.

Insiders say part of the reason for the latest move is the bad publicity the agency received for its handling of a notorious dogfightin­g case in southweste­rn Ontario.

Insiders said the case hurt donations to the charity.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada