The Peterborough Examiner

Johnson & Johnson stocks rise despite opioid verdict

- LINDA A. JOHNSON

Johnson & Johnson investors exhaled in relief Tuesday, pushing up shares after an Oklahoma judge imposed a $572-million verdict for the health-care giant’s role in the U.S. opioid crisis.

During the seven-week trial state prosecutor­s who sought up to $17 billion described J&J as a “kingpin” in an epidemic that’s killed more than 400,000 Americans since 2000.

The monetary award announced Monday, and J&J’s vow to appeal, reassured investors — at least for now.

“The risk of a loss was already baked into the stock price,” noted Erik Gordon, an analyst and professor at University of Michigan’s Ross School of Business.

The verdict would do little damage to J&J, which recorded profits of $22.3 billion last year.

And it set no precedent outside Oklahoma, said Gordon, as it’s based on a novel legal theory that J&J created a public nuisance in marketing its painkiller­s.

J&J appears to have multiple grounds for appeal, arguing it only had a one per cent share of opioid sales in Oklahoma and the country as a whole, and that the state didn’t prove it caused a public nuisance, “which traditiona­lly has been applied to resolve property disputes.”

J&J subsidiari­es sell Duragesic, a pain patch containing the powerful opioid fentanyl, and Nucynta pills.

Both carry the U.S. Food and Drug Administra­tion’s strongest warnings about risks of addiction, abuse and life-threatenin­g respirator­y depression. J&J says it marketed the drugs accordingl­y and didn’t mislead doctors about risks.

Two companies that sold far more opioids — Teva and Purdue Pharma, the maker of OxyContin — have already reached settlement­s to pay Oklahoma $85 million and $270 million, respective­ly.

Raymond James analyst Jason Bedford told clients that it’s likely an appellate court will reduce the $572-million verdict.

Still, J&J says it’s been named in more than 2,000 lawsuits brought by state and local government­s related to the marketing of opioids.

“This is not a battle. This is a war,” said analyst Steve Brozak, president of WBB Securities.

J&J can’t take a victory lap until the lawsuits play out or the parties reach settlement­s, Brozak said.

 ?? CHRIS LANDSBERGE­R THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Judge Thad Balkman reads a summary of his decision in the opioid trial in Norman, Okla. He ruled in favour of the state of Oklahoma and ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay $572 million to a plan to abate the opioid crisis.
CHRIS LANDSBERGE­R THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Judge Thad Balkman reads a summary of his decision in the opioid trial in Norman, Okla. He ruled in favour of the state of Oklahoma and ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay $572 million to a plan to abate the opioid crisis.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada