The Peterborough Examiner

Probe found lots of blame to go around

Lion Air crash report pointed to Boeing, pilots and maintenanc­e

- NINIEK KARMINI AND MARGIE MASON

JAKARTA, INDONESIA — An Indonesian investigat­ion found that a combinatio­n of design flaws by Boeing and inadequate pilot training and maintenanc­e lapses by Lion Air doomed a Boeing 737 Max jet that plunged into the Java Sea a year ago, killing 189 people.

The final accident report released Friday said Lion Air flight 610, from Indonesia’s capital Jakarta to the nearby town of Pangkal Pinang off Sumatra island, crashed partly because the pilots were never told how to quickly respond to malfunctio­ns of the Boeing jet’s automated flight-control system.

Investigat­ors indicated, however, that there was plenty of blame to go around. They said that nine critical problems were responsibl­e for the tragedy.

“If one of the nine hadn’t occurred, maybe the accident wouldn’t have happened,” chief investigat­or Nurcahyo Utomo said.

Budget carrier Lion Air’s jet vanished from radar after air traffic control was told the plane had altitude and air speed troubles. It plunged into the sea just 13 minutes after takeoff on Oct. 29, 2018.

Five months later, a similar malfunctio­n caused a Max jet to crash in Ethiopia, killing all 157 people on board.

That led to the grounding of all 737 Max jets and put Boeing under intense pressure to explain problems associated with the flight-control system, known as MCAS. The aircraft still has not resumed flying. Boeing officials say the company is nearly finished with changes to flight software and computers.

The troubles with the Max jets have also raised questions about the safety certificat­ion process in the U.S.

Indonesia’s National Transporta­tion Safety Committee said the MCAS on the Lion Air flight relied on a single “angle of attack” sensor that gave erroneous informatio­n, triggering an automatic nose-down pitch of the plane.

“The investigat­ion considered that the design and certificat­ion of this feature was inadequate,” according to a statement issued by the head of the committee, Soerjanto Tjahjono. “The aircraft flight manual and flight crew training did not include informatio­n about MCAS.”

The report released Friday outlined various missteps. The aircraft, only in use for two months, began having problems a few days before it crashed. A new angle of attack sensor was installed while the aircraft was on the Indonesian island of Bali a day before the crash, but it had been miscalibra­ted during an earlier repair, leaving it 21 degrees out of alignment. The problem was missed when it was installed, and the investigat­ors said they were unable to find out if the new sensor was properly tested.

Shortly after takeoff on a flight later that day from Bali to Jakarta, the airspeed and altitude warnings went off, activating the captain’s stick shaker and signalling an impending stall. The captain and co-pilot regained control of the aircraft by manually overriding the automated system with help from a third Lion Air pilot who was hitching a ride in the cockpit jump seat.

Instead of turning around, the plane continued to Jakarta and landed safely and the pilot did not report fully about the problems, including the activation of the stick shaker, the summary said. This oversight kept maintenanc­e crews from investigat­ing, and the critical informatio­n was not shared with the pilots of the flight that crashed.

Investigat­ors said the Indian captain and the Indonesian copilot were unaware of the entire situation because a warning function that should have told the pilots the two angle of attack sensors were out of sync was not installed on the aircraft.

“Let’s just say, that flight from Bali to Jakarta was very lucky,” said Indonesian aviation expert Gerry Soejatman, who says most of the blame for the crash should be placed on Boeing.

“How Boeing could allow the MCAS to rely on a single source of data and act upon that single source without cross-checking the other angle of attack indicator is anyone’s guess,” he said.

The latest news left victims’ relatives even more upset.

“We are very angry (at Boeing) because their negligence has caused our loved ones to die,” said Muhammad Asdori, 55, whose brother and nephew were killed in the Lion Air crash.

“They should have anticipate­d any kind of problems with adequate training for pilots who fly their planes. We were even more angry when we learned that they had only admitted their mistake when the second Max 8 plane crashed in Ethiopia.”

The Indonesian report followed another last month from U.S. federal accident investigat­ors who concluded that Boeing and the Federal Aviation Administra­tion underestim­ated how a blizzard of visual and auditory warnings would slow pilots’ ability to respond quickly enough to avert crashes.

Utomo, the Indonesian investigat­or, said co-ordination inside the cockpit was a problem during what was only meant to be an hour-long flight.

“We found that during the accident flight both pilots were busy and preoccupie­d by their own tasks,” he said.

Boeing issued a statement Friday saying it was working to address all the safety recommenda­tions to prevent similar flight control problems from recurring.

 ?? TATAN SYUFLANA THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Investigat­or Nurcahyo Utomo discusses the final report on last October’s fatal crash of a Lion Air Boeing 737 Max in in Jakarta.
TATAN SYUFLANA THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Investigat­or Nurcahyo Utomo discusses the final report on last October’s fatal crash of a Lion Air Boeing 737 Max in in Jakarta.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada