TANKER TURMOIL
Larger oil tankers may soon be setting sail for Vancouver harbour — some able to carry as much as a million barrels of oil. Officials says they’re safe, but critics worry about the impact of a local spill
“The minute the oil comes onshore, it’s our problem. Could we respond effectively to a major spill?” — Coun. Andrea Reimer
Bigger oil tankers, and more of them, may be headed to B.C.’S coast as companies plan to greatly expand shipments in local waters.
The plans, which include a proposal for monster Suezmax-sized tankers to pass under the Lions Gate Bridge in Vancouver, have led to fears over an increased risk of oil spills.
“Alberta oil may mean jobs, but we’re the ones absorbing the risk,” says Vancouver Coun. Andrea Reimer, who chairs the city’s environment committee.
Ben West of the Wilderness Committee says Vancouver was never a major oil exporting facility until recently.
“We’re operating under the assumption that companies will try to get bigger tankers into Vancouver, despite the risks of negotiating the Second Narrows,” he says.
But federal officials who manage Port Metro Vancouver say that the tankers meet all maritime safety standards.
Harbour master Yoss Leclerc says studies have shown oil tankers can move safely in local waters, although those studies do not include the one-million-barrel Suezmax tankers.
The largest oil tankers currently plying Vancouver waters carry 650,000 barrels.
“Vancouver harbour could accommodate two or three times the number of [approved] tankers at present,” he says. “We have performed simulations, trials, conducted training and updated communications — the whole nine yards.”
Pipe dreams
Pipeline giant Kinder Morgan could decide as early as next month to seek regulatory approval for a massive expansion to its Trans Mountain pipeline, which carries crude from Edmonton to the Burnaby waterfront.
Company president Ian Anderson says in a prepared statement that preliminary design work is being done to double pipeline capacity from 300,000 barrels per day to 600,000 bpd.
Anderson hopes that oil could be picked up from Kinder Morgan’s Burnaby wharf by Suezmax tankers.
The Alberta oil would be bound for expanding Asian markets, which reps say will lead to hundreds of billions of dollars in company profits and government tax revenues over the next 50 years.
Reimer says increased tanker traffic is very worrisome because memories are fresh of a five-million barrel spill in the Gulf of Mexico two years ago.
“There is certainly no power on local government’s part to say no to increased tanker traffic,” she says.
“We know oil spills happen quite often. We live in a region that highly values its waterfront. That is why people move to Vancouver and that is what is at risk,” she says.
“The minute the oil comes onshore, it’s our problem. Could we respond effectively to a major spill?” she asks.
Burrard Clean, a federally mandated agency responsible for accidents, is capable of handling spills up to 75,000 barrels.
Second Narrows’ dangers
Oil tankers must pass through the Second Narrows on their way to Kinder Morgan’s dock in Burnaby.
The tight passageway is subjected to swift tidal currents flowing down the Indian Arm, so ships move at slack tide.
“It’s very shallow. If this was a street corner it would have extra lights and warnings,” says West.
The Second Narrows would have to be dredged to accommodate bigger tankers and Kinder Morgan’s Westridge dock facility in Burnaby would have to be expanded as well.
Leclerc says both would require an environmental review and consultation with the public before a decision was made.
Leclerc says harbour authorities would look favourably upon a proposal to upgrade to Suezmax-sized tankers if one was received.
“As a port authority, we are here to support growth for Canada. Our role is to make it safe,” he says.
Awkward timing
Kinder Morgan’s preliminary designs, which were released last week, come at an inconvenient time. A spill at the company’s tank storage farm in Abbotsford riled up local residents on Jan. 24, while a fire at British Petroleum’s Cherry Point refinery in Washington State Feb. 17 curtailed jet fuel deliveries to Vancouver airport and led to an increase in the price of gas at Lower Mainland pumps.
Environmental advocate John Vissers, who chaired a meeting between Abbotsford residents and Kinder Morgan, says a drain broke on a 50-year-old tank with a flat roof at the storage facility.
“The oil went in the drain and gushed out,” says Vissers, who toured the facility with company reps.
A total of 110,000 litres escaped but was contained on site.
Vissers says residents want a better relationship with the company because they know the pipeline is likely to be around another 50 years.
“We’re hoping that Kinder Morgan takes us seriously, that we’re not just a hick town in the valley,” he says.
Fraser River concerns
There are also plans afoot to develop a wharf on the Fraser Riverin Richmond that would allow Panamax-sized vessels to deliver 475,000 barrels of jet fuel per shipment.
That fuel would then be piped to the Vancouver International Airport.
“The Panamax tankers are three football fields long. That is a very large ship,” says Richmond Mayor Malcolm Brodie, whose council is adamantly opposed to the plan.
“They pose a danger to the river foreshore. We’re not satisfied with the ability of the port to contain an oil spill,” he says.
Leclerc says at least three tugs in Vancouver harbour guide every Afromax-sized tanker, which carry
“Vancouver harbour could accommodate two or three times the number of [approved] tankers at present.” — Harbour master Yoss Leclerc
650,000 barrels.
His own experiences as a ship captain in the Mediterranean back up his sense of security.
He says the Strait of Gibraltar handles more tanker traffic in a day than Vancouver does all year.
“The ship channels are very narrow,” he says.
If the jet fuel proposal to Richmond passes an environmental review, the next stage will be a Port Metro review and full public consultation. It could be operating in three years.
Tankers were approved for Kitimat on Feb. 23 by Transport Canada, which ruled that the long marine passages to B.C.’S coastal waters contain no obstructions that could pose safety risks.
The ships would service the proposed Northern Gateway pipeline, a 525,000-barrel-per-day project from Edmonton that is undergoing a twoyear regulatory approval process.
Kinder Morgan presi-dent Ian Anderson refused requests for an interview.