The Province

Radioactiv­e traces from Fukushima pose no danger

‘ESSENTIALL­Y SAFE’: Sample collected near dock in Ucluelet in February contains ‘very tiny’ amount

- BETHANY LINDSAY POSTMEDIA NEWS

Traces of radioactiv­e isotopes from the Fukushima disaster have been detected on the B.C. shoreline, but the amounts are so tiny that they pose no danger to human health or marine ecosystems.

The contaminat­ed sample was collected at a dock in Ucluelet on Feb. 19 and found to contain 1.5 Bequerels per cubic metre of Cesium-134, the isotope being used as a marker for radioactiv­ity from the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident in Japan.

“Those units don’t mean very much to most people,” said Jay Cullen, a chemical oceanograp­her at the University of Victoria and a partner in the research.

“But for comparison, the maximum allowable concentrat­ion that we have in Canadian drinking water, that’s set by Health Canada, is 10,000 Bequerels per metre cubed.

“They’re very tiny. By any internatio­nal standard or any Canadian standard, the amount of radioactiv­ity that we’re seeing is essentiall­y safe.”

The amount is so small, in fact, that a person who swam for six hours a day for a year in water that contained twice the level of Cesium-134 found in this sample would receive a radioactiv­e dose less than one-thousandth that of a single dental X-ray.

The Ucluelet sample was collected as part of a crowd-funded program called Our Radioactiv­e Ocean, set up by the Woods Hole Oceanograp­hic Institutio­n in the U.S. to monitor the radioactiv­e plume spreading eastward from Japan.

Canadian scientists first detected Fukushima radioactiv­ity 1,500 kilometres west of B.C. in June 2012, more than a year after a huge earthquake triggered the tsunami that flooded the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plants.

Since then, a team led by oceanograp­her John Smith at Fisheries and Oceans Canada has been monitoring isotope levels and creating models to predict the amounts expected to hit the coast. So far, the news is good. “The prediction is that we will not approach levels that will present a danger to anybody’s health,” Cullen said, adding it’s unlikely that marine organisms will be at risk.

The next few months will be crucial for researcher­s.

While prediction­s about the movement of Fukushima radioactiv­ity have been accurate so far, ocean circulatio­n patterns near shore make it much more difficult to forecast exactly when and where contaminat­ed water will reach land.

Cullen’s network of citizen scientist volunteers, Fukushima InFORM, is collecting samples at 14 coastal locations every month, and will post results on fukushimai­nform.ca as soon as they are available.

 ?? — PNG FILES ?? A contaminat­ed sample found at a dock near Ucluelet on Feb. 19 was shown to have minuscule traces of radioactiv­e isotopes from the Fukushima disaster.
— PNG FILES A contaminat­ed sample found at a dock near Ucluelet on Feb. 19 was shown to have minuscule traces of radioactiv­e isotopes from the Fukushima disaster.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada