The Province

Who really benefits from Canada’s fossil-fuel sector?

- BILL CARROLL JOUKE HUIJZER Bill Carroll is a professor of sociology at the University of Victoria and co-director of the Corporate Mapping Project, a research and public engagement project investigat­ing the power of the fossil fuel industry in Western Ca

Many Canadians, politician­s and business people in particular, are quick to tout the value of the fossil-fuel sector to our national economy. But who primarily benefits from these industries?

The major investors in Canada’s fossil-fuel sector (oil, bitumen, gas and coal) have high stakes in maintainin­g business as usual, rather than addressing the industry’s serious climate change issues.

Our just-published Corporate Mapping Project report, Who Owns Canada’s Fossil-Fuel Sector? Mapping the Network of Ownership and Control, shows that substantia­l ownership and strategic control of our fossil-fuel sector is in the hands of a few major players. These shareholde­rs have both an interest in the sector’s continued growth and the economic power to shape its future.

The powerful interests that dominate fossil-fuel activities in Canada include:

Foreign-based fossil-fuel transnatio­nals (notably Exxon Mobil, owner of both Imperial Oil and ExxonMobil Canada, and Royal Dutch Shell, owner of Shell Canada);

Canadian banks (notably Royal Bank of Canada, Toronto-Dominion Bank and Bank of Montreal);

Wealthy families such as the Montreal-based Desmarais family who control investment company Power Corporatio­n of Canada;

Asset management firms such as BlackRock Inc. and Capital Group (both based in the U.S.).

Rising levels of Canadian corporate ownership and control of the sector appear to have made little difference in how the industry functions. Decades ago, foreign control of Canada’s energy sector (and other sectors) was seen as a threat to Canadian self determinat­ion and democracy, but the trend toward more Canadian corporate control of fossil-fuel extraction and production has made little difference in how the industry functions.

Canadian interests, including banks, may now own and control a substantia­l share of the sector, yet rather than representi­ng the national interest of Canadians, these owners pursue their own interests in maximizing immediate profits from extracting and processing fossil fuels.

Shareholdi­ngs, however, are not the only capital relations between high finance and big carbon.

Canadian banks are major lenders to the fossil-fuel sector. To illustrate the scale of the loans, consider that from 2017 until the federal government purchase in May 2018, the Kinder Morgan Trans Mountain Pipeline expansion project had a $5.5-billion loan facility agreement with the five Canadian big banks. Without such financial enablement, megaprojec­ts such as the proposed pipeline could not be mounted.

The urgency to respond to climate change cannot be understate­d. We agree with the leading divestment group 350.org that financial institutio­ns must end lines of credit and project loans for fossil-fuel infrastruc­ture like new pipelines and fracking drill rigs. This, in effect, would keep the carbon in the ground. Even Suncor, the second-largest producer of fossil fuels in Canada, acknowledg­es that some reserves are best left undergroun­d.

Our report maps the ownership network and interests of fossil-fuel companies in Canada, revealing who the key players are and how their stakes are configured. This is informatio­n that we are pleased to add to the literature about the urgency to respond to climate change before it’s too late.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada