The Province

Working for the man? Only in his dreams

Federal lawyer’s memos to nobody lay bare dysfunctio­n in forgotten corner of Trump’s Washington

- JULIET LINDERMAN

WASHINGTON — Mark Robbins gets to work at 8:15 each morning and unlocks the door to his office suite. He switches on the lights and the TV news, brews a pot of coffee and pulls out the first files of the day to review.

For the next eight hours or so, he reads through federal workplace disputes, analyzes the cases, marks them with notes and logs his legal opinions. When he’s finished, he slips the files into a cardboard box and carries them into an empty room where they will sit and wait. For nobody.

He’s at 1,520 files and counting.

Such is the lot of the last man standing in this forgotten corner of Donald Trump’s Washington. For nearly two years, while Congress has argued and the White House has delayed, Robbins has waited to be sent some colleagues to read his work and rule on the cases. No one has arrived. So he toils in vain, writing memos into the void.

Robbins is a one-man microcosm of a current strand of government dysfunctio­n. His office isn’t a high-profile political target. No politician has publicly pledged to slash his budget. But his agency’s work has effectivel­y been neutered through neglect.

Promising to shrink the size of government, the president has been slow to fill posts and the Republican-led Congress has struggled to win approval for nominees. The combined effect isn’t always dramatic, but it’s strikingly clear when examined up close.

“It’s a series of unfortunat­e events,” says Robbins, who has had plenty of time to contemplat­e the absurdity of his situation. Still, he doesn’t blame Trump or the government for his predicamen­t.

“There’s no one thing that created this problem that could have been fixed. It was a series of things randomly thrown together to create where we are.”

Robbins is a member of the Merit Systems Protection Board, a quasi-judicial federal body designed to determine whether civil servants have been mistreated by their employers. The three members are presidenti­ally appointed and Senate-confirmed for staggered seven-year terms. After one member termed out in 2015 and a second did so in January 2017, both without replacemen­ts lined up, Robbins became the sole member and acting chairman. The board needs at least two members to decide cases.

That’s a problem for the federal workers and whistleblo­wers whose 1,000-plus grievances hang in the balance, stalled by the board’s inability to settle them. When Robbins’ term ends on March 1, the board probably will sit empty for the first time in its 40-year history.

It’s also a problem for Robbins. A new board, whenever it’s appointed and approved, will start from scratch. That means while new members can read Robbins’ notes, his thousand-plus decisions will simply vanish.

“There is zero chance, zero chance my votes will count,” the 59-year-old lawyer says, running his fingers over leather-bound volumes lined up neatly on a shelf. Inside are the board’s published rulings. None of the opinions he’s working on will make it into one of them.

“Imagine having the last year and half of your work just ... disappear,” he said.

“It’s not like I’m sitting around on the sofa watching soap operas and eating bonbons. I’m still doing my job,” he said. “It’s only when the agency stops working that people realize what we do and the value we bring.”

“Maybe someday they’ll say, ‘Good old Robbins, he just kept plugging along.’ ”

Frustratin­g? Yes. But at least it makes for a good story at parties.

“When I say to people, ‘And then my votes just disappear,’ the crowd usually goes ‘Oh, no!”’ he said. “And there’s empathy, there’s real empathy.”

The board, establishe­d in 1978, is responsibl­e for protecting 2.1 million federal employees from bias and unfair treatment in the workplace. The board handles appeals from whistleblo­wers and other civil servants who say they were mistreated or wrongly fired, and want to challenge an initial ruling by an administra­tive judge. The board also conducts independen­t research and writes policy papers destined for the president’s desk.

Robbins is quick to point out the staffing crisis began under former president Barack Obama, back when Robbins’ first colleague termed out without a replacemen­t.

Others say it’s the Trump administra­tion’s fault.

Trump has lagged slightly behind his predecesso­rs in nominating political appointees. As of Nov. 19, he had nominated people for 929 positions, compared with Obama’s 984 and Bush’s 1,128 at the same point in their presidenci­es. Congress has acted on just 69 per cent of those nomination­s, according to data provided by the Partnershi­p for Public Service, a non-partisan organizati­on promoting government efficiency.

Max Stier, the partnershi­p’s CEO, blames the administra­tion, the Senate and a dysfunctio­nal system of appointing and confirming political nominees.

“There are many different flavours of the same problem,” he said.

Meanwhile, Robbins keeps plugging away and the cases keep piling up.

“We are running out of space,” he said, shimmying between towers of boxes in a storage closet close to six feet tall. More boxes are stacked against the hallway wall and piled up in the clerk’s office.

“Any additional cases I work from now on are just grains of sand on a beach.”

I’m still doing my job. It’s only when the agency stops working that people realize ... the value we bring. Mark Robbins

 ?? — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILES ?? Mark Robbins, the last remaining member of the Merit Systems Protection Board, sorts paperwork on his desk in Washington. “It’s not like I’m sitting around on the sofa watching soap operas and eating bonbons,” he says.
— THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILES Mark Robbins, the last remaining member of the Merit Systems Protection Board, sorts paperwork on his desk in Washington. “It’s not like I’m sitting around on the sofa watching soap operas and eating bonbons,” he says.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada