The Province

E-mails more ammo for EU

Facebook under scrutiny

- AOIFE WHITE

Facebook e-mails showing the company threatened to cut off data to potential rivals added a new target for the regulatory armory being amassed by European regulators.

The publicatio­n of the e-mails by U.K lawmakers preceded a vote by EU legislator­s Thursday that backed draft rules requiring online platforms to treat businesses — including rivals — fairly.

In the new year Germany, will conclude an antitrust probe that may call on Facebook to change privacy terms. European privacy regulators are also armed with the power to fine for breaches following the rollout of the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation in May.

“Facebook is now on notice that we cannot continue to undermine the trust citizens place not only in our online platforms, but our democracy itself,” said Claude Moraes, a British member of the European parliament who quizzed Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg at a June hearing.

“A big stick is available to the EU in the form of competitio­n and taxation powers.”

A trove of internal correspond­ence, published online Wednesday, provided a look into the ways Facebook executives, including Zuckerberg, treated informatio­n posted by users like a commodity.

Apps were invited to use Facebook’s network to grow, as long as that increased usage of Facebook. Certain competitor­s, in a list reviewed by Zuckerberg himself, were not allowed to use Facebook’s tools and data without his personal sign-off.

The message may increase scrutiny around whether Facebook is a monopoly — one of the social network’s biggest political risks.

Damien Geradin, a Brussels-based lawyer at Euclid Law, said the refusal of access to Vine data could be seen as a potential refusal to deal with rivals. He said Facebook would need to be shown as essential to users, and it’s “not clear it is.”

Tim Wu, a professor at Columbia Law School, said the e-mails “suggest exclusiona­ry conduct” against Vine and “clearly add to the case that the acquisitio­n of WhatsApp was illegal,” according to a Twitter post.

New legislatio­n might require Internet giants to treat rival services “equally without discrimina­tion” with some exceptions, according to rules voted by EU lawmakers on Thursday.

Their version still needs to be backed by the full European parliament, likely next week, and then the final text of the law must be negotiated with EU government­s. Germany already sees Facebook as the country’s dominant social network, which puts the company on warning.

The way Internet giants wield user data — and their ability to crush rivals by cutting off links to it — is increasing­ly a focus for European regulators. Both the EU and Germany are looking at how Amazon. com Inc. treats sellers on its platform, with the EU zeroing in on the advantage it gets on rivals’ bestsellin­g items if it starts selling its ownbrand copycats.

Microsoft and Apple were scrutinize­d over how they might choke off rivals’ access in EU probes of their takeover plans. Facebook escaped a long probe from the EU over the deal but was later fined €110 million ($167.5 million) for failing to disclose how it could link data between services.

Privacy officials are also showing impatience with Facebook, with British informatio­n commission­er Elizabeth Denham telling the U.K. Parliament the company needs to significan­tly change its business model and practices.

 ?? — AP FILES ?? E-mails published by U.K. lawmakers Wednesday showed how Facebook bosses including Mark Zuckerberg have treated user data.
— AP FILES E-mails published by U.K. lawmakers Wednesday showed how Facebook bosses including Mark Zuckerberg have treated user data.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada