The Standard (St. Catharines)

Time for MDs to practise self-care

Doctors have not been looking after themselves on the labour front of late

- MARTIN REGG COHN

Ontario doctors are mad.

Mad at the last Liberal government.

Mad at the present Progressiv­e Conservati­ve government.

Mad at the Ontario Medical Associatio­n.

Mad at their fellow doctors.

Mad at themselves.

Or mad at all of the above.

Doctors do God’s work looking after patients. But they have not been looking after themselves on the labour front of late, which is most maddening of all.

After going for years without a contract, many MDs grew to hate the Liberals in power, prompting the membership to reject a 2016 agreement negotiated by their OMA leaders at the time. Dissident doctors pined for a Progressiv­e Conservati­ve government that promised a goodfaith negotiatio­n — with arbitratio­n if necessary.

“The Liberals created a toxic relationsh­ip with our doctors by making unilateral decisions,” the premier’s spokespers­on declared after the Tories took power. “Doug Ford is committed to respecting Ontario’s physicians and fixing the relationsh­ip.”

Be careful what you wish for. Hoping for healing is not enough. The Tories took Ontario’s doctors for a wild ride this week. Despite Ford’s personal promise to respect physicians and protect the process, the premier’s office pulled the plug: It would no longer be legally bound by binding arbitratio­n. A lawyer’s letter abruptly declared the process dead and buried. The government tried to dismiss its own appointee to the three-member arbitratio­n panel the next day. Just like that. Promise made, promise broken.

The OMA exploded. Doctors went ballistic. Labour lawyers were apoplectic, accusing the government of not only losing its way but flouting the law.

Both sides are prone to grandstand­ing in labour negotiatio­ns, walking away from the bargaining table or unleashing ultimatums. But aborting arbitratio­n, after agreeing to abide by it, is not part of the playbook if it violates a formally agreed legal framework.

The Tories’ self-serving explanatio­n was that the OMA is now riven by divisions, and could no longer be counted upon to deliver its members if they ever reached a deal. In short, the government declared non-confidence in its bargaining opponent.

As outlandish as that assertion might be in law, it is not outrageous in reality. For it is a fact that the OMA, in a previous incarnatio­n, reached a tentative agreement two years ago with the previous Liberal government, only to fumble the ball.

It was a compromise, as all negotiatio­ns are. But the OMA executive, having sealed the deal, couldn’t deliver the deal to its members.

Dissident doctors, led by the bestpaid specialist­s (who resisted taking a haircut so that lower-paid general practition­ers could catch up), whipped up opposition to the deal. They won the vote, defeated the deal, and ousted the OMA’s old leadership on the promise of getting a better bargain after the next election.

While the doctors were playing tough, another group of profession­als took a different tack: Ontario’s teachers’ unions opted to take the best deal they could get from then-premier Kathleen Wynne, who wanted to avoid pre-election labour strife.

Teachers took the money and ran — before time ran out on the election clock, and before the province’s fiscal situation deteriorat­ed. Doctors, by contrast, rejected their own deal, rebelled against their own organizati­on, and turned against each other.

A civil war among physicians has culminated in a secession attempt by highly paid specialist­s who want to create the “Ontario Specialist­s Associatio­n, “or OSA, to rival the OMA. The latest internal warfare provided the pretext for the government to opt out of binding arbitratio­n.

The stakes are high for doctors and patients, politician­s and taxpayers. MDs get more than $12 billion a year — roughly 10 per cent of the annual budget.

Having accused the Liberals of fostering a “toxic relationsh­ip,” Ford has personally poisoned the well by going back on his word. Perhaps the premier could not resist exploiting the weakness of a faction-ridden OMA — an organizati­on that never missed an opportunit­y with the Liberals, reposing its faith in Ford for a panacea on pay.

By week’s end, the Tories had done another U-turn. Facing pressure from doctors, or perhaps a second opinion from their lawyers, the government undid its ultimatum — and agreed to arbitratio­n again. Just like that. Promise made, promise broken, promise remade. No doubt doctors are hoping for healing again. But we should all have learned by now to be careful what we wish for.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada