The Standard (St. Catharines)

GOP’s witness wish list spurned

Neither whistleblo­wer nor Biden will publicly testify at probe, Dems say

-

With the impeachmen­t inquiry into U.S. President Donald Trump poised to enter a public phase, lawmakers on Sunday sparred over the witnesses who will be allowed to testify.

Democrats dismissed Republican efforts to call the anonymous whistleblo­wer and former vice-president Joe Biden’s son Hunter.

In an interview on ABC News’s “This Week,” Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Calif., a member of the House Intelligen­ce Committee, raised the issue of the “great risk associated with (the whistleblo­wer’s) life right now.” She also said that it is unnecessar­y for the individual to appear before the intelligen­ce panel because other witnesses who were actually on Trump’s July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky — which is at the centre of the inquiry — will testify.

“The only thing that the whistleblo­wer can say is that he was told by other people about the phone call,” Speier said. “We have the other people coming forward to actually testify. So you have direct evidence, not indirect evidence.”

Speier argued that having Hunter Biden testify would also be “irrelevant” because he “is unrelated to the Ukraine call.” Some of the witnesses Republican­s have requested may be allowed, she added, including National Security Council official Tim Morrison and former Ukraine envoy Kurt Volker, both of whom have already testified behind closed doors.

Another Democrat on the Intelligen­ce Committee, Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney of New

York, also rejected the call for Hunter Biden to testify.

“He has no knowledge of what the president did or didn’t do here that is the subject of the impeachmen­t hearing,” Maloney said on “Fox News Sunday.”

Republican­s have sought to minimize Trump’s role in the campaign to pressure Ukraine, and the list of potential witnesses they released Saturday suggests they will continue to do so.

Among those on the list are Hunter Biden, whose father is a leading Democratic candidate to challenge Trump in 2020; Hunter Biden’s business partner Devon Archer; the unnamed whistleblo­wer, whom Trump and some of his allies have campaigned to publicly identify; the researcher Nellie Ohr of Fusion GPS, which commission­ed a dossier that linked Russia and Trump; and Alexandra Chalupa, a Ukrainian

American who worked with the Democratic National Committee.

House Intelligen­ce Committee chair Adam Schiff, D-Calif., said in a statement Saturday that Democrats would evaluate the requests but that the impeachmen­t probe “will not serve … as a vehicle to undertake the same sham investigat­ions” into the Bidens or the 2016 campaign, or to retaliate against the whistleblo­wer.

Several Republican­s on the Sunday morning news shows focused on the process of the impeachmen­t inquiry rather than on the substance of the allegation­s against Trump.

Rep. Mac Thornberry, R-Texas, argued on “This Week” that “there will be a taint to this onesided, partisan approach to impeachmen­t.”

He said it would be “inappropri­ate,” but not impeachabl­e, for a president to ask a foreign leader to investigat­e a political rival, as Trump is alleged to have done. The importance of process, Thornberry maintained, cannot be ignored.

“There’s a reason we let murderers and robbers and rapists go free when their due process rights have been violated,” Thornberry said.

On “Fox News Sunday,” Rep. Will Hurd, R-Texas, said the impeachmen­t inquiry “has been a partisan exercise from the very beginning.” He said Republican­s want to hear testimony from Hunter Biden.

Hurd also argued that Schiff should be forced to testify about his office’s contacts with the whistleblo­wer, claiming that the committee chair “misled the American public earlier in the year about what he knew about the contact with the whistleblo­wer.”

 ?? ANDREW HARNIK ASSOCIATED PRESS FILE PHOTO ?? Rep. Jackie Speier, a California Democrat, suggests that forcing the anonymous whistleblo­wer to testify for the impeachmen­t inquiry would put that person’s life at risk.
ANDREW HARNIK ASSOCIATED PRESS FILE PHOTO Rep. Jackie Speier, a California Democrat, suggests that forcing the anonymous whistleblo­wer to testify for the impeachmen­t inquiry would put that person’s life at risk.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada