Singh calls benefits proposal a win
NDP leader says talks of paid sick leave have him hopeful about deal
OTTAWA — Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s minority Liberal government took a step toward safety Thursday when the New Democrats reacted positively to proposed legislation on higher emergency benefits for workers.
“This is a major win,” NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh told reporters in Ottawa.
The Liberal throne speech introduced Wednesday needs the support of at least one of the major opposition parties for the government to survive a confidence vote, or else Canada could head into a federal election as parts of the country are already in a second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Conservatives have already said they will vote against it and the Bloc Québécois say they are leaning that way unless the Liberals meet demands from the provinces to add billions to annual federal health transfers by next week.
That leaves the New Democrats as the Liberals’ most likely dance partner but Singh had conditions of his own: legislation assuring that Canadians left jobless due to the pandemic won’t have their emergency benefits cut and that Canadians who fall ill will get paid sick leave.
The Liberals introduced legislation Thursday that would keep the value of weekly benefits for unemployed workers to $500 a week, instead of lowering payments to $400.
The Canada Emergency Response Benefit, which is due to expire this week, has paid $500 a week throughout the pandemic. The same floor will be placed on employment insurance benefits for those eligible for the program.
“Things are looking good,” Singh said.
He stopped short of saying the NDP would vote in favour of the throne speech, saying the NDP is still negotiating with the Liberals on the paid sick leave. But he said he’s hopeful the two parties will reach an agreement.
Earlier Thursday, several dozen MPS took their seats in the chamber, while more signed in online as opposition parties readied to give their official responses to Wednesday’s speech from the throne.
The Conservatives were unequivocal: they will not support the throne speech. They accused the Liberals of using prorogation, which led to the speech, to shut down parliamentary scrutiny of their decision to award WE Charity a contract to run a student grant program.
Before debate on the speech could even get underway, Conservative MP Michael Barrett was up on his feet saying his privileges had been breached by the redactions of documents related to that affair, showing that the Opposition does not intend to let that issue go.
“If the speech from the throne was about presenting a refreshing agenda reflecting the COVID pandemic, the prime minister could have simply prorogued Parliament the night before last, or yesterday morning for that matter,” Barrett said.
“What he didn’t need to do was to shut down Parliament on the 18th of August. The only thing that accomplished was to kill committee investigations cold in their tracks.”
The committees are to be reconstituted in the coming days, part of getting the hybrid Parliament back underway.
In debating the speech itself, Conservative deputy leader Candice Bergen said the Liberals’ plan leaves numerous Canadians out, citing seasonal workers, people who run tourism businesses, families that are nursing along old minivans and can’t afford new electric cars, people who drive pickup trucks and are “tired of being insulted by Liberal elites.”