The Telegram (St. John's)

Australian coroner says dingo took baby in 1980 Outback case

- BY ROD MCGUIRK

not believe that a dingo was strong enough to take away the baby. Public opinion swayed harshly against the couple; some even spat on Chamberlai­n-Creighton and howled like dingoes outside her house.

No similar dingo attack had been documented at the time, but in recent years the wild dogs have been blamed for three fatal attacks on children. Few doubt the couple’s story today, but the latest inquest — which the family had fought to get — made it official that Azaria was killed in a dingo attack.

The news was welcomed many around the country.

Yvonne Cain, one of the 12 jurors in the 1982 trial that convicted a then-pregnant Lindy Chamberlai­n of murder, was thrilled that a dingo is now on the record as the culprit.

“The dingo has done it. I’m absolutely thrilled to bits,” Cain said. “I’d always had my doubts and

by

ATearful moment

ustralians have overwhelmi­ngly welcomed the final chapter of a mystery that has captivated the country for 32 years: did a dingo really take a baby that vanished from an Outback campsite in 1980?

A country that was once bitterly divided on whether baby Azaria Chamberlai­n had been dragged away by a wild dog or murdered by her mother now largely agrees that the parents deserve the vindicatio­n a coroner’s court provided Tuesday.

A day after Azaria Chamberlai­n would have turned 32, a coroner found that a dingo had taken her as a nine-week-old baby from a tent near Ayers Rock, the red monolith in the Australian desert now known by its Aboriginal name Uluru. That is what her parents had maintained from the beginning. The eyes of Lindy Chamberlai­nCreighton and her ex-husband, Michael Chamberlai­n, welled with tears as the findings of the fourth inquest into their daughter’s disappeara­nce were broadcast from a courtroom in the northern city of Darwin to television­s around Australia.

The first inquest in 1981 had also blamed a dingo. But a second inquest a year later charged Chamberlai­n-Creighton with murder and her husband with being an accessory after the fact. She was convicted and served more than three years in prison before that decision was overturned.

A third inquest in 1995 left the cause of death open.

The case became famous internatio­nally through the 1988 Meryl Streep movie “A Cry in the Dark.”

Many Australian­s initially did have become cent.”

Cain said while she still encounters people who doubt the Chamberlai­ns’ innocence, they inevitably misunderst­and the evidence that was against them.

“When people say she’s guilty, I say: ’ You have no idea what they’re talking about — I was there,”’ she said.

An expert on dingo behaviour, Brad Purcell said he was not surprised that a dingo would enter a tent and take a baby while older siblings slept.

Purcell suspects that many people blamed Chamberlai­n-Creighton for leaving the baby in a tent where a dingo could have been attracted by her crying.

“She was almost being condemned because she wasn’t acting as a responsibl­e parent,” Purcell told the Australian Broadcasti­ng Corp.

certain

she’s inno-

But not all Australian­s accept the latest ruling.

A policeman who was at Uluru the night Azaria disappeare­d said he still believes the first coroner’s finding that there was some human interventi­on.

Frank Morris, who has since retired from the police force, said while he was not trying to blame the parents, he thought someone played a part in moving clothing Azaria wore that night.

“We don’t know who. That is the $64,000 question,” Morris said.

“If you go to court enough times, you are bound to get a win sooner or later,” Morris added of the parents’ victory Tuesday.

Azaria’s parents and her three siblings, including 29-year-old sister Kahlia who was born in prison, on Tuesday collected her new death certificat­e.

“We’re relieved and delighted to come to the end of this saga,” a tearful but smiling Chamberlai­nCreighton told reporters outside the court.

Coroner Elizabeth Morris said she was “satisfied that the evidence is sufficient­ly adequate, clear, cogent and exact and that the evidence excludes all other reasonable possibilit­ies.”

The findings mirror those of the first coroner’s inquest in 1981.

But that inquest found that somebody had later interfered with Azaria’s clothing, which was later found relatively unscathed in the desert.

A second coroner’s inquest triggered a Northern Territory Supreme Court trial that resulted in Chamberlai­n-Creighton being found guilty of slashing her daughter’s throat and making it look like a dingo attack.

She was convicted in 1982 and sentenced to life in prison with hard labour. She was released in 1986 after evidence was found that backed up her version of events: the baby’s jacket, found near a dingo den, which helped explain the condition of the rest of the baby’s clothing. A Royal Commission, the highest form of investigat­ion in Australia, debunked much of the forensic evidence used at her trial and her conviction was overturned.

A third inquest could not determine the cause of death.

The fourth inquest heard new evidence of dingo attacks, including three fatal attacks on children since the third inquest.

Morris noted that dingo experts disagree on whether a dingo could have removed the clothing so neatly and without causing more damage.

“It would have been very difficult for a dingo to have removed Azaria from her clothing without causing more damage than what was observed on it, however it would have been possible for it to have done so,” she said.

Michael Chamberlai­n had threatened to go to the Northern Territory Supreme Court to force another inquest if Morris had not agreed to reopen the case. Another coroner had rejected his applicatio­n in 2004 for a fourth inquest to challenge the 1995 finding.

“This has been a terrifying battle, bitter at times, but now some healing and a chance to put our daughter’s spirit to rest,” Chamberlai­n told reporters.

He said his quest for a death certificat­e that acknowledg­ed his daughter had been killed by a dingo had seemed to be a “mission impossible.”

“This battle to get to the legal truth about what caused Azaria’s death has taken too long,” Chamberlai­n said.

“However, I am here to tell you that you can get justice even when you think that all is lost. But truth must be on your side.”

 ?? — Associated Press file photo ?? In this Feb. 2, 1982, file photo, Michael (left) and Lindy Chamberlai­n leave a courthouse in Alice Springs, Australia. A coroner found Tuesday a dingo took the Chamberlai­ns’ baby who vanished in the Australian Outback more than 32 years ago in a...
— Associated Press file photo In this Feb. 2, 1982, file photo, Michael (left) and Lindy Chamberlai­n leave a courthouse in Alice Springs, Australia. A coroner found Tuesday a dingo took the Chamberlai­ns’ baby who vanished in the Australian Outback more than 32 years ago in a...

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada