The Telegram (St. John's)

Paul Lane wants independen­t review of Energy Corporatio­n Act

- BY ASHLEY FITZPATRIC­K ashley.fitzpatric­k@thetelegra­m.com

Independen­t MHA Paul Lane wants changes to the Energy Corporatio­n Act considered by an independen­t statutory review committee, and handled the same way changes to the Access to Informatio­n and Protection of Privacy Act (ATIPPA) were handled in 2014.

The Energy Corporatio­n Act governs Nalcor Energy, and Premier Dwight Ball said in early December he is ready to make changes to the act in order to make the provincial energy corporatio­n more transparen­t.

The premier spoke on the heels of questions to the government about Nalcor Energy’s use of embedded contractor­s, and a ruling from Informatio­n and Privacy Commission­er Donovan Molloy, who said the Energy Corporatio­n Act provisions prevail over any provisions for disclosure of informatio­n under the ATIPPA.

While Ball has said he is ready to address informatio­n restrictio­ns, he has not said exactly what changes might be made and what the approach would be.

Lane, the MHA for Mount Pearl-southlands, has offered some ideas.

In a letter to the premier Dec. 29, Lane states a “dark cloud” hangs over Nalcor Energy and he recommends the government not simply draft new legislatio­n. Instead, he calls for the process to be open to the public.

“As you will recall, a similar approach was taken by the former administra­tion in reviewing Bill 29 and it resulted in good legislatio­n,” he states. “I sincerely believe that this type of independen­t, public process is likewise required to ensure the best possible legislativ­e amendments to the Energy Corporatio­n Act and to restore the trust and confidence of the people of Newfoundla­nd and Labrador.”

The letter recommends beginning the work before the Muskrat Falls Inquiry — a twoyear examinatio­n of a Nalcor Energy-led megaprojec­t — is completed.

Lane told The Telegram — while the premier has not said he would or would not wait — two years would be too long to leave the Energy Corporatio­n Act unaddresse­d.

“I think we all know and understand that the Energy Corporatio­n Act, as it currently stands, is an issue. It is a problem in terms of public disclosure, like Bill 29 was, and I see no reason why we need to wait two years for Justice (Richard) Leblanc to tell us to review the Energy Corporatio­n Act. We should just go ahead and review the Energy Corporatio­n Act.”

Lane’s letter on Friday was copied to Progressiv­e Conservati­ve Leader Paul Davis and NDP Leader Lorraine Michael.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada