The Telegram (St. John's)

Corner Brook approves crematoriu­m applicatio­n

Not all councillor­s agree controvers­ial facility should be located in residentia­l area

- DIANE CROCKER WEST COAST REPORTER diane.crocker@thewestern­star.com @Ws_dianecrock­er

CORNER BROOK — The City of Corner Brook has approved a controvers­ial applicatio­n to construct a crematoriu­m.

It's the second time Country Haven Funeral Home owner Dwayne Parsons sought permission to do so at his property at 167 Country Rd.

Much like the first time he did so in 2017, not everyone on council wanted to grant the request. But this time the number of councillor­s who supported the applicatio­n was enough to secure an approval.

The funeral home is located in a community service zone, where a crematoriu­m would be considered a discretion­ary use under the city's developmen­t regulation­s.

The public consultati­on held on the applicatio­n resulted in nine submission­s in support of the crematoriu­m and 86 submission­s against it. There was also a petition against the facility signed by 250 people. Main areas of concern dealt with emissions and property values.

An analysis of an emissions report on the same unit the funeral home is proposing to use from the provincial environmen­t department concluded it would be compliant with the ambient air quality standards for Newfoundla­nd and Labrador.

City staff recommende­d approving the applicatio­n subject to conditions that the funeral home follow best practices, industry standards and Occupation­al Health and Safety programs, and have a preventive maintenanc­e program and annual inspection­s.

These would not be regulated by the city, but it would request reports to ensure the conditions are met.

AGAINST THE MOTION

Councillor­s Vaughan Granter, Linda Chaisson and Josh Carey voted against the applicatio­n.

The fact it is not a regulated industry was one of the factors Granter said he considered in his opposition.

“Should we have regulation­s in place first before we approve a crematoriu­m or do we approve a crematoriu­m and then put regulation­s in after?” he asked while commenting on the motion.

Granter said the city needs a crematoriu­m, and the city needs to work with the proponent to ensure that happens, but he did not support it in that location based on the opposition of residents and the lack of regulation­s.

Chaisson said she agreed the city needs a crematoriu­m, but not in that location.

She said people are upset because they didn't buy a house next door to a crematoriu­m and are afraid of the unknowns about the facility.

Carey said the points being raised during the discussion were similar to those raised when the previous council considered Parsons' 2017 applicatio­n. He said the issue can't be addressed through zoning because it's not zoned for any particular type of developmen­t.

“The hands are somewhat tied when you're into a discretion­ary use zone area, because it's there for that purpose, for council to exercise discretion over it.”

APPLICATIO­N SUPPORT

Mayor Jim Parsons, Deputy Mayor Bill Griffin and councillor­s Tony Buckle and Bernd Staeben voted in favour of the applicatio­n.

Staeben said he was glad to see informatio­n on air-quality standards from the province, noting council didn't have access to that informatio­n in 2017.

Buckle said he felt confident enough to make a decision after seeing the emissions and air-quality data, and the conditions that have to be met by the funeral home.

“And yes, the unknown is frightenin­g ... but I think in order to move ahead, sometimes we've got to not worry about the unknown, keep moving forward.”

Griffin said if the zoning of the area had been fixed the last time, then the applicatio­n would not have come up again.

“We shouldn't be putting the people of Country Road through this, and we shouldn't be putting that business through this just to turn it down.

“If it meets, it meets. If it don't, it don't. We should go with the facts and make decisions based on the facts.”

Mayor Parsons said air quality appears to be the main issue and he's not sure if the previous applicatio­n addressed that. He said the province does not see air-quality issues with the proposal, and assessing the quality of the air is the responsibi­lity of the province.

He also said there is no evidence to prove the developmen­t would affect property values.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada