The Telegram (St. John's)

No seditious conspiracy charges in U.S. Capitol riots cases

- MARK HOSENBALL

WASHINGTON — Nearly five months after hundreds of Donald Trump supporters launched a deadly assault on the U.S. Capitol, prosecutor­s have not carried out an early threat to charge some participan­ts with seditious conspiracy.

They may never do so, according to a law enforcemen­t official and legal experts, because of prosecutor­s’ past difficulty in securing conviction­s on those charges against far-right activists.

Instead, the more than 440 people charged with joining in the Jan. 6 violence that left five people dead including a Capitol Police officer have been charged with crimes ranging from entering a restricted building to criminal conspiracy.

These differ from a charge of seditious conspiracy alleging attempts “to overthrow, put down or to destroy by force the government of the United States.”

Federal prosecutor­s first raised the idea of charging Capitol rioters with seditious conspiracy at a Jan. 26 news conference.

“One of the more significan­t charges people are very familiar with is the sedition conspiracy. That’s what we’re trying to build towards,” said Michael Sherwin, who at the time was acting as chief federal prosecutor for the District of Columbia.

Sherwin did not immediatel­y reply to a request for comment.

A law enforcemen­t official, who asked for anonymity to discuss debates among prosecutor­s, said there had been little recent discussion among key officials regarding seditious conspiracy charges, which carry a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison.

The official said that historical­ly, federal prosecutor­s have encountere­d obstacles when they have tried to prosecute alleged far-right activists on such charges.

“Seditious conspiracy is a vague and overbroad statute that could be used to criminaliz­e some legitimate forms of protest and much mundane criminal activity,” said Joshua Braver, an assistant professor at the University of Wisconsin Law School.

“The statute’s revival is recent and the statute was dying a slow and quiet death; it would be a mistake to resuscitat­e it,” he said.

Justice Department spokesman Marc Raimondi declined to comment on the department’s current views on bringing seditious conspiracy charges, referring a journalist to prior court documents and news releases.

Then-president Trump was impeached by the U.S. House of Representa­tives and acquitted by the Senate on a charge of inciting insurrecti­on in a fiery outdoor s peech before the Capitol assault. Some accused rioters have said they believed they were following Trump’s directions.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada