The Telegram (St. John's)

Legault approaches meeting with Trudeau as 'nation to nation' summit

- ROBERT LIBMAN Robert Libman is an architect and planning consultant who has served as Equality Party leader and MNA, as mayor of Côte-st-luc and as a member of the Montreal executive committee. He was a Conservati­ve candidate in the 2015 federal election.

Are Quebec and Ottawa on another collision course? Next Friday, Premier François Legault will meet with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to supposedly iron out several contentiou­s issues regarding immigratio­n powers and responsibi­lities. Immigratio­n is one of the last remaining jurisdicti­ons that Quebec craves to exercise complete control over.

This encounter doesn’t seem like a Canadian province meeting with the federal government to settle difference­s, but more like a “nation to nation” summit. Quebec, under Legault, acts like a sovereign state, blithely passing laws that run roughshod over minority rights and doing whatever it wants, like with the university tuition assault , all without pushback from the rest of Canada.

It’s chillingly apparent how Legault and his cabinet ministers have increasing­ly been referencin­g “Quebec nation” in statements — reinforcin­g in the public consciousn­ess Quebec’s de-facto independen­ce, and defiance of Ottawa — presumably as a hedge against the rise of the Parti Québécois:

After the Court of Appeal upheld Quebec’s religious symbols law, Bill 21 — largely because any potential rights violations were shielded by the pre-emptively used notwithsta­nding clause — Legault referred to “a beautiful victory for the Quebec nation ” confirming “Quebec’s right to make its own decisions.”

In reacting to the federal government’s concerns about Quebec’s slow processing of family unificatio­n requests, Immigratio­n Minister Christine Fréchette said: “Ottawa’s approach does not respect the will of the Quebec nation. ”

On another issue, Canadian Relations Minister Jeanfranço­is Roberge said: “The federal government cannot dismiss out of hand the Quebec nation’s manifest desire to expand medical assistance in dying .”

That’s three gauntlets right there, thrown down in the past few weeks.

Both Legault and Trudeau are reeling in the polls. With the Coalition Avenir Québec trailing the PQ , Legault’s nationalis­t anti-ottawa rhetoric may escalate going into the meeting. He likely believes that he can ill afford to come away with much less than practicall­y stripping Ottawa of any say over who can enter Quebec, and/or a ton of cash.

Trudeau has already shown considerab­le subservien­ce to Quebec’s actions, particular­ly regarding language and identity politics. Since Quebec remains one of the few regions where his poll numbers are somewhat competitiv­e, expect some major concession­s. Plus, his main rival, Conservati­ve Leader Pierre Poilievre, has demonstrat­ed that he intends to be a servile lackey for Legault and curry favour to win votes. Poilievre’s apparent attempt recently to get a “proquebec” news clip by refusing to elaborate on a journalist’s question in English — saying smugly, “We’re in Quebec, right?” — was pathetic. It wasn’t in Pointe-au-pic but Pointe-claire, in Quebec’s most anglophone federal riding.

Legault may also warn Trudeau to stay out of the Bill 21 debate. After last week’s ruling , federal Justice Minister Arif Virani said Ottawa would (finally) intervene if Bill 21 ends up before the Supreme Court, “to defend the Charter (of Rights and Freedoms)” and on the preemptive use of the notwithsta­nding clause . Virani acted like Hercules when criticizin­g Saskatchew­an’s government for invoking the notwithsta­nding clause to pass a law preventing children under 16 from changing their names or pronouns at school without parental consent. He even pinned a statement at the top of his Twitter profile criticizin­g the move. But on Bill 21, he looked like a deer in headlights at his news conference. We’ll see if the Liberals ultimately skulk away from this commitment.

This latest immigratio­n play is another step toward Legault achieving — without a referendum — René Lévesque’s sovereignt­y-associatio­n, but still maintainin­g the perks: transfer and equalizati­on payments from a weak-kneed Canadian federation.

“Collision” between Quebec and Ottawa is not the right choice of words if the federal government continues to allow Quebec to drive a steamrolle­r.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada