The Telegram (St. John's)

Confederat­ion was Newfoundla­nd’s only option: historian

James Hiller says social services promise lured many to favour joining Canada, lacking other viable options

- DIANE CROCKER WEST COAST REPORTER diane.crocker@saltwire.com @Ws_dianecrock­er

When Newfoundla­nders were asked in June 1948 if they wanted to join Canada, the response wasn’t a resounding yes.

It was the first of two referendum votes on the future of the then-dominion of Newfoundla­nd.

On the ballot were three choices: responsibl­e government, Confederat­ion with Canada or commission of government.

Responsibl­e government received the majority of the votes, but no option succeeded in receiving over 50 per cent. So, in July 1948, a second vote was held with just responsibl­e government and Confederat­ion on the ballot.

This time around, the vote swung in favour of Confederat­ion, with the vote percentage just over 52 per cent. Newfoundla­nd officially joined Canada on March 31, 1949.

ONLY OPTION

Historian James Hiller has long been interested in how the end of responsibl­e government came about and how the decision to join Canada was made.

After devoting a large portion of his career — Hiller is a published author, was a pastpresid­ent of the Newfoundla­nd and Labrador Historical Society and is a history professor — to studying Confederat­ion, he believes it was the only option Newfoundla­nd had.

“The lack of responsibl­e government energy was very striking. That lack of energy of the responsibl­e government people was very clear, and they didn’t fight,” he told Saltwire.

“They tried various strategies, but they were disunited. They didn’t have a strong leadership.”

Hiller said there were many who disagreed with Confederat­ion, pointing to businessma­n and politician Peter Cashin, who was a stalwart for the anti-confederat­es and pushed for a return to responsibl­e government.

“I think that the sense of security and the sense of the Canadian social services are such as would negate any independen­ce.” James Hiller Historian

PROMISES OF BETTER TIMES

Overall, people didn’t know a lot about Confederat­ion, Hiller said.

“I think that much depended on the local situation.”

The appeal of Confederat­ion was the full range of Canadian social services that would be available to people. It would also mean financial security for Newfoundla­nd.

“Given the hard times of the Depression and followed by the prosperity of the Second World War, society had changed,” Hiller said.

LOSS OF IDENTITY?

The vote may have been in favour of joining Canada, but it took a while for people to feel like they were Canadian, Hiller said.

“They were very slow sometimes. There’s a controvers­y still about Confederat­ion and that loss of (a Newfoundla­nd) identity,” he said.

“Don’t forget that Newfoundla­nd had been an independen­t country for many years. Since the 1800s, really, and it had been hard to lose that identity.”

PROMISES FULFILLED

In the years that followed, the promises of Confederat­ion did materializ­e for the people of Newfoundla­nd.

Seventy-five years later, most people would accept that Confederat­ion was a good idea, Hiller said, and if the vote were to happen again today, he believes the result would be the same.

“I think that the sense of security and the sense of the Canadian social services are such as would negate any independen­ce,” he said.

U.S. OR GOING IT ALONE?

What would have happened if Confederat­ion had not occurred is something Hiller finds hard to establish.

“I think it would have meant hard times. Very uncertain times,” he said.

Even today, many say Newfoundla­nd should have joined the United States, but that was not an option on either referendum.

“It was certainly discussed, and one might have thought that it was a realistic option, but the British would not allow it,” he added.

Had it been an option, Hiller said, it would have possibly gained a majority. “But it’s very uncertain.” While some provinces have entertaine­d the idea of separating from Canada, Hiller is quite adamant it’s not something Newfoundla­nd and Labrador should consider.

“One of the features about Newfoundla­nd society is its loyalty, and I think that it would be expressed. I don’t think anybody would have thought of leaving,” said Hiller.

 ?? ??
 ?? CONTRIBUTE­D ?? St. John’s historian James Hiller believes Confederat­ion was a good thing for Newfoundla­nd.
CONTRIBUTE­D St. John’s historian James Hiller believes Confederat­ion was a good thing for Newfoundla­nd.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada