The Telegram (St. John's)

N.L. government can’t be seduced into believing hydrogen industry can solve problems

-

Open letter to the N.L. Minister for Environmen­t and Climate Change, Bernard Davis: We appreciate that you’ve been put in an impossible position. Soon you’ll be announcing your decision on the amendment to the Environmen­tal Statement by World Energy GH2.

At Enviro Watch NL — our money is on the government of N.L. greenlight­ing the project “with conditions”. For how could you say no to something that has been in the works on provincial, national and internatio­nal levels long before it was ever made public to the local people who will be most impacted?

Some have called for a public review board to hold hearings on the WEGH2 proposal. We reject that notion completely because we do not accept the rationale for the WEGH2 project or any of the other mega industrial turbine/ hydrogen/ammonia plans that are currently in the works.

These mega projects have nothing to do with addressing climate change — they are about subsidy harvesting, a strategy where environmen­tally disincline­d corporatio­ns hunt staggering amounts of public funds via ‘investment tax credits’.

The proponents of some of these developmen­ts have very unsavoury profession­al histories and it would be naive to believe any of them are in this because they want to help mitigate the effects of climate change.

We are gravely concerned that our provincial government is being seduced by industry proponents into believing that a hydrogen industry is bound to be the panacea for the world’s energy problems. Many industry experts have expressed serious doubt about the whole idea of hydrogen as having wide applicatio­n for replacing fossil fuels.

Even the Canadian Commission­er of Environmen­t and Sustainabl­e Developmen­t recently reported that optimism bias has caused Natural Resources Canada to overestima­te hydrogen’s potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. We remind readers that 80 per cent of all energy inputs will be lost when exporting ‘green’ hydrogen to distant markets.

We are most concerned about the devastatin­g impacts these developmen­ts will have on the natural environmen­t, on nearby communitie­s, and the tourism industry. The WEGH2 proposal for the Port au Port Peninsula is one of utter insanity that will bring misery to the people who live there. The plan for the Anguille Mountains in the Codroy Valley will reap destructio­n on the ecosystem of southwest Newfoundla­nd.

And for what? For a massive industrial experiment that will leech common resources, harvest subsidies from taxpayers, enrich proponents, and through a tragically inefficien­t and energy intensive process provide expensive ammonia to Germany. Let us not mention the fact that there are as of yet no buyers for this product.

It is our unfortunat­e history in this province that local elites have granted foreign corporatio­ns carte blanche to exploit our common resources in exchange for a few jobs. Such political bias has caused us to lose control of so many of our resources.

A genuine approach to mitigating climate change would see small-scale community based renewable energy projects that actually benefit our people and that integrate with the environmen­t in least harmful ways. Having public discussion­s — about the need to reduce our consumptio­n of energy and materials, and to focus on building up our local resilience to climate change would make far more sense from an Environmen­t and Climate Change perspectiv­e and would really be something to appreciate.

Tara Manuel Co-chair Envirowatc­h NL Corner Brook

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada