The Telegram (St. John's)

European court ruling puts cautious Swiss in climate bind

- GABRIELLE TÉTRAULTFA­RBER DAVE GRAHAM

GENEVA/ZURICH — Switzerlan­d for all its snowcapped mountains and crisp Alpine air has failed to protect its people from the ravages of climate change, as a top European court ruled this week.

Behind the picture postcard exterior, critics say, is a country that has done too little for the planet and acted as a business hub for some of the most powerful internatio­nal corporatio­ns in fossil fuels and mining.

Political analysts and academics also say entrenched conservati­sm and a political system governed by popular referendum­s will complicate reform even after Tuesday’s ruling by the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.

It found in favour of over 2,000 Swiss women — a third of them over 75 — who said their country’s inaction in the face of rising temperatur­es puts them at risk of dying during heatwaves.

The ruling cannot be appealed and the Swiss Federal Office of Justice, which represente­d the government before the court, said it must be implemente­d. It said it would analyse the ruling to determine the measures the country needed to take.

Immediatel­y after the court decision, the Swiss Green Party called for climate targets for specific industries, including the finanical sector.

“People may have slightly beautiful dreams about Switzerlan­d,” Lisa Mazzone, the party leader, said.

“Switzerlan­d is the country of commodity trading, Switzerlan­d is the country with a strong financial sector with a lot of investment in fossil fuels,” she added.

Swiss-based commodity trading companies handle 40% of all oil trades and 60% of the metal trading business, according to data published by industry associatio­n Suissenégo­ce.

The group of Swiss women known as Klimasenio­rinnen did not make Swiss trading central to their case, although their Greenpeace-backed campaign that lasted many years called for tougher regulation to curb transactio­ns fueling global warming.

REFERENDUM­S

A 2022 internatio­nal study into environmen­tal sustainabi­lity ranked Switzerlan­d in the top 10, but government efforts to implement stricter climate goals have so far been limited by the country’s regular referendum­s.

Leading Swiss newspapers took a sceptical view of the ruling in editorials that said it could undermine democracy.

The largest party, the rightwing Swiss People’s Party, said Switzerlan­d should withdraw from the Council of Europe, which seeks to promote human rights in Europe and beyond, calling the court’s judges “puppets for activists”.

 ?? REUTERS ?? Rosmarie Wydler-walti and Anne Mahrer, of the Swiss elderly women group Senior Women for Climate Protection, attend the hearing of the court for the ruling in the climate case Verein Klimasenio­rinnen Schweiz and Others v. Switzerlan­d, at the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in Strasbourg, France, April 9.
REUTERS Rosmarie Wydler-walti and Anne Mahrer, of the Swiss elderly women group Senior Women for Climate Protection, attend the hearing of the court for the ruling in the climate case Verein Klimasenio­rinnen Schweiz and Others v. Switzerlan­d, at the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in Strasbourg, France, April 9.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada