Justice and science in public health policy needed as federal government hikes taxes for vaping

Open letter to the Canadian government: I am writing today not merely as a concerned Canadian citizen, but as one outraged by the glaring failures and injustices in our approach to public health policy, particularly concerning nicotine addiction.

The legislative measures recently taken against vaping products starkly contrast with the more balanced approaches used for other addictions, notably alcoholism and drug dependencies. This disparity is not only scientifically unfounded but also morally reprehensible.

The draconian increase in excise taxes on vapour products highlighted in the federal budget is nothing short of predatory. It targets individuals who have turned to vaping as a means to reduce harm from smoking, punishing them instead of supporting their efforts.

While resources are poured into understanding and aiding those with alcohol and drug issues, those struggling with nicotine addiction face financial exploitation through punitive taxation. This not only discourages smokers from choosing a less harmful alternative but also betrays a shocking indifference to public health.

Furthermore, the decision by the Honourable Mark Holland, Minister of Health, to push through a ban on flavoured vapour products — despite significant public opposition during past consultations — is an affront to democratic engagement and a blatant disregard for evidence-based policymaking.

Why are we punishing nicotine users with such extreme measures when similar, less intrusive policies are thoughtfully applied to other health challenges? This inconsistency is not just alarming; it is a cause for anger.

Alcohol and drug policies often strive to balance restriction with rehabilitation, acknowledging the complex nature of addiction. In contrast, the approach to nicotine is trapped in a punitive mindset that harms rather than helps, reflecting a ‘Quit or Die’ philosophy that is both outdated and cruel.

This policy direction does more than fail those it claims to protect; it actively pushes them towards dangerous, unregulated black markets, increasing public health risks and reducing the safety of our communities. How can these decisions be justified under the guise of protecting public health when they do the exact opposite?

It is time for our elected representatives to realign their strategies with the pillars of justice, scientific integrity, and genuine compassion. We demand a reevaluation of nicotine policies that matches the evidence-based, empathetic approaches afforded to other addictions.

Public health policy should enable safer choices, not criminalize and penalize those struggling with dependency. Your policies are currently a betrayal of Canadian values and a detriment to the public good. We demand an immediate overhaul of these misguided vaping regulations and insist on the adoption of fair, equitable, and scientifically sound public health policies.

Consider this letter not just a plea but a demand for action. The electorate is watching, and we expect policies that reflect our values of fairness and care for every citizen. We will settle for nothing less. Yours in profound disappointment and in anticipation of swift corrective action.

Tristan Wall St. John’s