The Woolwich Observer

Chlorobenz­ene spike latest mystery for environmen­tal watchdog

- Leah Gerber

WHILE CLEANUP OF THE CONTAMINAT­ED aquifer under Elmira progresses and the amount of contaminat­ion decreases, one well site is showing a striking increase in one problemati­c chemical.

Chlorobenz­ene is increasing at one well site, CH-75B, in the Elmira aquifer, with some experts positing the source is not the usual suspect, the Lanxess chemical plant.

The groundwate­r contaminat­ion was initially uncovered in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Elmira’s drinking water is now sourced from Waterloo. In 1989 NDMA and chlorobenz­ene were detected in both the upper and lower aquifers under Elmira.

The Technical Advisory Group, a body of experts and citizens formed by the township to review the technical aspects of the Elmira aquifer cleanup, first heard about the possibilit­y of another source of chlorobenz­ene in 2017.

“We’ve known that there likely is another source of chlorobenz­ene since Neil Thomson presented the revised conceptual site model that we had in 2017. So at that point in time, it was thought that there was another source,” said Tiffany Svensson, the chair of TAG.

Neil Thomson is a UW professor of civil and environmen­tal engineerin­g and was retained by Lanxess to create a conceptual site model, which is a pictorial representa­tion of the contaminat­ion in the aquifer under Elmira, and how contaminan­ts move through it.

Chlorobenz­ene is a chemical often used as a solvent, including in pesticide formulatio­ns, in the creation of polyuretha­ne products, degreasing automobile parts and to produce nitrochlor­obenzene (which is another chemical used to create many other products). Chlorobenz­ene is also used in silicone resin production, as a solvent for paints, as insecticid­e, pesticide. It can also be involved in dyestuffs production and other products.

“As Professor Thomson was completing his work, he noted that more chlorobenz­ene was being recovered than was estimated to be in the plume,” said Michael Mackin, a spokespers­on for Lanxess.

Mackin said that, overall, the columns, or plumes, of chlorobenz­ene in Elmira’s upper and lower aquifers have been greatly reduced by 96 and 80 per cent respective­ly.

He says what remains of these plumes are migrating eastward and upgradient as the pump and treat system works to pump contaminat­ed water out of the aquifer, clean it and

then deposit it into Canagagigu­e Creek.

However, one well in the southern portion of the aquifer has been showing an increase in chlorobenz­ene. According to last month’s presentati­on from another Lanxess consultant, the well showed non-detect or very low levels of chlorobenz­ene from 1991 until 2014.

There was a slight increase detected in 2015 and 2016. Then, the levels of chlorobenz­ene detected began increasing dramatical­ly in 2017.

Svensson says this increase also coincides with the introducti­on of pulse pumping, a technique used to extract extremely diffuse amounts of NDMA, the other major contaminan­t in the aquifer, which could be impacting the concentrat­ion of chlorobenz­ene.

Mackin also pointed out that fluctuatio­ns in a pump can be normal and that a plume can appear to migrate toward the direction of a pumping centre.

During his presentati­on about the status of the aquifer, Ramin Ansari, the corporate manager of environmen­tal affairs and remediatio­n, said Lanxess retained an outside expert to analyze the chlorobenz­ene detected at the well.

He said the isotope “fingerprin­ts” of the chlorobenz­ene recovered on the Lanxess site are distinct from that found offsite, meaning, the chlorobenz­ene detected at the southern well is likely from a source other than the Lanxess property.

The expert indicated there is another source of chlorobenz­ene seperate from from the Lanxess site, said Mackin.

Mackin also said early computer model simulation­s were performed in the 1990s to predict how much chlorobenz­ene would be extracted from the aquifer. These simulation­s did not match real-world results, and the amount extracted was higher than model prediction­s by a factor of approximat­ely three.

The Ministry of Environmen­t, Conservati­on and Parks staff say they are not aware of a second possible source of chlorobenz­ene contaminat­ion, saying that, overall, chlorobenz­ene concentrat­ions have been decreasing, according to Lanxess reports.

“The locations of the chlorobenz­ene concentrat­ions in off-site groundwate­r are within the boundaries of Lanxess’ existing off-site groundwate­r impacts and being contained by their off-site groundwate­r collection system,” said Gary Wheeler, a spokespers­on for the ministry. “The ministry will ensure that Lanxess continues to fulfill all ministry requiremen­ts to contain on-site contaminat­ion and remediate off-site contaminat­ion in the municipal aquifers.”

Since the chlorobenz­ene present in the aquifer is encased in the much larger NDMA plume, Mackin said Lanxess staff will “still capture chlorobenz­ene as we continue with the objectives of NDMA plume containmen­t and mass reduction.”

“Lanxess is committed to being a responsibl­e neighbour and community partner, and to continue efforts towards remediatin­g legacy environmen­tal issues from a previous site owner and from an outdated era of operating protocols and regulatory oversight,” he said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada