> Editorial: Horgan’s fine line,

When our premier-designate, John Horgan, is sworn in on July 18, it looks as if he will be taking two oaths. One is the oath of office, administered by Lt.-Gov. Judith Guichon. However, the NDP leader also appears intent on abiding by a second oath — the Hippocratic oath — which demands that physicians “first, do no harm.”

Horgan’s immediate priorities, he says, are the fentanyl crisis, the softwood-lumber dispute with the U.S. and public education. The Green Party leader, Andrew Weaver, backs that approach.

This could be considered a “first, do no harm” list, because it entails little or no risk to the new government. There is indeed an epidemic of overdose deaths, but the blame cannot, in the main, be laid at the provincial government’s door.

The primary cause is the lethal nature of fentanyl. The drug is between 50 and 100 times more powerful than morphine, and a new generation — carfentanil — is 10,000 times stronger than morphine. When these drugs are mixed by dealers into various cocktails, there is almost no way to use them safely.

So, yes, Horgan is right to call for more preventive measures, but no one will blame him if the epidemic continues. When has a “war on drugs” ever been won?

On the softwood-lumber issue, the province has little to contribute beyond a lobbying effort. This is a matter for the federal government to resolve. While Prime Minister Justin Trudeau appears sympathetic, a solution — if there is one — can be hammered out only between Ottawa and Washington, D.C.

As for public education, all of the parties agree on the need to reinvest in the K-12 sector. Here, too, Horgan is playing to an acquiescent audience. Who doesn’t support additional money for education?

But what of the more contentious matters? Rather than immediately cancelling B.C. Hydro’s Site C dam, the NDP and Greens will ask the B.C. Utilities Commission to examine the project’s business case.

That kicks the can down the road for a while, but not for the duration of a four-year term of office. Eventually, this nettle will have to be grasped.

So, also, the expansion of the Kinder Morgan pipeline. Both the prime minister, and more awkwardly, Alberta’s NDP Premier Rachel Notley, support the project.

Indeed, some believe Notley’s re-election depends on getting the pipeline built, and there has been speculation about reprisals by Alberta if B.C. tries to kill it.

Yet both Horgan and Weaver oppose going ahead. A fight between neighbouring NDP governments looms, and a decision cannot be deferred indefinitely.

On the matter of raising the minimum wage to $15 an hour, delaying tactics are also being used. Both Horgan and Weaver support the wage hike, but the proposal is controversial because of the potential for job loss, particularly in the small-business sector. Their solution is to refer the matter to a fair-wages commission for further study.

Horgan’s short-term strategy, then, is this: Show that a minority government can work by moving ahead on only those issues where there is broad public consensus, and leave the more combustible issues till later.

Ironically, however, whether the new premier can keep his ship afloat might depend on Weaver.

The Green leader has already shown a prickly temperament. He recently scuttled a scheme by the NDP to end secret ballots in union-certification votes.

But his challenge extends beyond preserving a calm demeanour. It is essential, if his party is to remain relevant, that he demonstrate a significant degree of independence.

Can he do this, while propping up his end of an awkward political marriage? He has a few months to show us.