Times Colonist

Trump eyes release of migrants in ‘sanctuary cities’

President: ‘They’re always saying they have open arms. Let’s see if they have open arms’

- JILL COLVIN and COLLEEN LONG

WASHINGTON — U.S. President Donald Trump said Friday he is strongly considerin­g releasing “Illegal Immigrants” into Democratic stronghold­s to punish congressio­nal foes for inaction on the border— just hours after White House and Homeland Security officials insisted the idea had been rejected as fast as it had been proposed.

“Due to the fact that Democrats are unwilling to change our very dangerous immigratio­n laws, we are indeed, as reported, giving strong considerat­ions to placing Illegal Immigrants in Sanctuary Cities only,” Trump tweeted. He added: “The Radical Left always seems to have an Open Borders, Open Arms policy — so this should make them very happy!”

The reversal, which appeared to catch officials at the Department of Homeland Security off guard, came as critics were blasting Trump for the supposedly rejected idea, accusing him of turning migrants into pawns to go after his political opponents. It comes as Trump has grown increasing­ly exasperate­d by a surge of Central American migrant families crossing the southern border and is looking for new ways to pressure congressio­nal Democrats to change laws that he insists are making the problem worse.

Last week, Trump urged his soon-to-be acting Homeland Security secretary Kevin McAleenan to seal the southern border. Trump told McAleenan he would pardon him if he were to find himself in trouble for blocking legal asylum-seekers, according to two people familiar with the conversati­on who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe a private exchange.

It was not clear whether the president was joking, and a Homeland Security spokesman said in a statement: “At no time has the president indicated, asked, directed or pressured the acting secretary to do anything illegal.”

The reported conversati­on came during the president’s trip last week to Calexico, California, a day after he announced he was delaying his threat to close the border because Mexico appeared to be stepping up its enforcemen­t efforts.

Before Trump’s tweets on Friday, both the Department of Homeland Security and a White House official had insisted in nearly identical statements that the sanctuary-cities plan had been floated but then flatly rejected.

But not, apparently, by the president, who emphatical­ly revived the idea.

Asked about it by reporters, he said he was “strongly looking at” releasing migrant families into those communitie­s.

“They’re always saying they have open arms. Let’s see if they have open arms,” he said.

There were no indication­s, however, that officials were taking any steps to move forward with the idea or considered the president’s words anything more than bluster.

“Sanctuary cities” are places where local authoritie­s do not co-operate with Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t officials, denying informatio­n or resources that would help ICE round up for deportatio­n people living in the country illegally.

They include New York City, Seattle and San Francisco, home city of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who on Friday called the idea “unworthy of the presidency of the United States and disrespect­ful of the challenges that we face as a country, as a people, to address who we are — a nation of immigrants.”

Rep. Bennie Thompson of Mississipp­i, who chairs the House Homeland Security committee, said it “serves as a reminder that the Trump administra­tion’s reckless immigratio­n agenda is not about keeping the country safe, but about partisan politics and wantonly inflicting cruelty. ”

The idea of pressing immigratio­n authoritie­s to embrace the plan was discussed in November and then again in February as the Trump administra­tion struggled with a surge of migrants at the border, according to three people who spoke on condition of anonymity to outline private conversati­ons. Homeland Security and ICE lawyers quickly rejected the proposal on the grounds that it was complicate­d, too expensive and a misuse of funds, two of the people said.

The plan, which was first reported by the Washington Post, is one of a litany of ideas being tossed around by an increasing­ly anxious White House in recent months. Officials say they are running out of options, and have proposed and recycled numerous ideas.

Trump in recent weeks, for instance, has discussed the idea of renewing his administra­tion’s controvers­ial family separation policy and has threatened to completely seal the U.S.-Mexico border despite opposition from many in his administra­tion.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada