Cook’s aim was knowledge

Re: “Vandalism of Cook statue raises questions about role of monuments: historians,” Aug. 28.

Firstly, kudos to Dr. Lorne Hammond for providing an accurate and nuanced view of Capt. James Cook and his contributions to humanity, along with acknowledgment of some of his flaws. Like Dr. Hammond, I would also support the addition of a plaque elaborating on some of the unfortunate effects of Cook’s voyages.

Almost 300 years ago, Cook embarked on three epic voyages around the world that immeasurably enhanced scientific and geographical knowledge. While Cook was not perfect, his contributions to surveying, navigation, cartography, botany, the elimination of scurvy and several other scientific advancements were invaluable and of benefit to all of humanity.

It is indisputable that later colonization by other Europeans resulted in great suffering by Indigenous people. However, unlike other “explorers” such as Columbus, Cortez, Pizarro, de Gama and many others whose statues arguably should be removed, Cook’s aim was not the subjugation and oppression of Indigenous people in pursuit of gold and other riches. Rather, he sought to make peaceful contact with the peoples of the world in order to advance knowledge and cultural exchange.

The vandals who defaced the statue of Cook may perhaps be forgiven for their uninformed and destructive act. However, the suggestion of the University of Victoria professor of geography to remove the statue in order to “challenge these Eurocentric views of history” is extreme and unwarranted. Perhaps UVic should consider offering positions to those who present a more balanced view of history to their students.

Gary Armbrust Saanich