Times Colonist

Pentagon delayed response to riot: general

- ERIC TUCKER and MARY CLARE JALONICK

WASHINGTON — Defense Department leaders placed unusual restrictio­ns on the National Guard for the day of the Capitol riot and delayed sending help for hours despite an urgent plea from police for reinforcem­ent, according to testimony Wednesday that added to the finger-pointing about the government response.

Maj. Gen. William Walker, commanding general of the District of Columbia National Guard, told senators that the then-chief of the Capitol Police requested military support in a “voice cracking with emotion” in a 1:49 p.m. call as rioters began pushing toward the Capitol. Walker said he immediatel­y relayed the request to the Army but did not learn until 5:08 p.m. that the Defence Department had approved it. Guard troops who had been waiting on buses were then rushed to the Capitol, arriving in 18 minutes, Walker said.

The hours-long delay cost the National Guard precious time in the early hours of the rioting, with Walker saying he could have gotten personnel into the building within 20 minutes of getting approval. As it stood, the support did not happen until the evening.

The delay also stood in contrast to the swift authorizat­ion for National Guard support that Walker said was granted in response to the civil unrest that roiled Washington last June as an outgrowth of racial justice protests.

A senior Pentagon official who testified, Robert Salesses, said it took time for the army to sort out what the National Guard was being asked to do and what its support might look like, especially since the Capitol Police days earlier had not asked for any help.

Military officials were also concerned about the optics of a substantia­l National Guard presence at the Capitol, and that such visuals could inflame the rioters, Walker said.

“The army senior leadership” expressed “that it would not be their best military advice to have uniformed Guardsmen on the Capitol,” Walker said.

The Senate hearing is the latest about the missed intelligen­ce and botched efforts to quickly gather National Guard troops as a mob of then-president Donald Trump’s supporters laid siege to the Capitol. The hearings have spelled out the challenge law enforcemen­t officials face in sorting through an ocean of unverified tips but also highlighte­d how police inadequate­ly prepared for the Trump loyalists; that FBI warnings about the threat of violence did not reach top police officials; and that requests for aid were not promptly answered.

“We in the FBI want to bat 1,000, and we want to not have this ever happen again,” said Jill Sanborn, the bureau’s top counterter­rorism official and one of the witnesses. “So we’re asking ourselves exactly the questions that you’re asking: Is there a place we could have collected more [intelligen­ce]? Is there something we could have done?”

Meanwhile, the Capitol Police disclosed the existence of intelligen­ce of a “possible plot” by a militia group to breach the Capitol on Thursday.

The revelation, coming as the acting police chief was testifying before a House subcommitt­ee, differed from an earlier advisory from the House sergeant-at-arms that said police had no indication that any such violence was planned.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada