Times Colonist

Coroner role after death of Indigenous child argued before Ont. top court

-

The failure of a coroner to fully investigat­e the death of a four-year-old Indigenous boy was part of a systemic derelictio­n of duty that ought to face legal scrutiny, Ontario’s top court heard on Thursday.

In submission­s to the Court of Appeal, a lawyer for the family of Brody Meekis said it was wrong for a judge to dismiss their lawsuit against the coroner before trial on the grounds he had acted within his discretion.

“It’s an exercise of racist discretion,” Julian Falconer told the court. “The failure of coroners to attend death scenes in remote First Nations communitie­s is a pattern: It is a pattern, respectful­ly, of derelictio­n of duty.”

Meekis died in the remote Sandy Lake First Nation in northweste­rn Ontario of complicati­ons from strep throat in May 2014 — something antibiotic­s would likely have averted. Nurses at the nursing station refused to give him an appointmen­t, instead telling his mother to give him Tylenol, court heard.

He was the second Indigenous child to die under similar circumstan­ces in a matter of months.

Despite guidelines, the coroner, Dr. Wojciech Aniol, did not go to Sandy Lake to investigat­e the boy’s death or interview his family or the nurses. Instead, he asked local police to investigat­e any family drug or alcohol abuse, court heard.

“When we talk about the loss of Brody Meekis and the needless death of Brody Meekis, we are left haunted by the question: If the coronial system had been functionin­g the way that it should have been for Indigenous people … would Brody Meekis be alive today?”

The coroner’s office also failed to talk to the family about the death investigat­ion or its decision against calling an inquest, the lawyer said.

Brody’s family sued Aniol, his superiors and the province for damages. They allege misfeasanc­e in public office, negligent supervisio­n and breach of equality rights.

However, a lower court judge tossed the case in April 2019 as having no prospect of success. Essentiall­y, the court agreed with the province that the coroner was under no legal obligation to go to a death scene and had acted within his discretion.

The family appealed, arguing Superior Court Justice John Fregeau was legally wrong and the underlying issues need to be thrashed out at a full trial. Allowing the earlier decision to stand, Falconer said, sends the message that the death of a First Nations person is not as important as everybody else.

The coronial system, he said, failed to do its job to shed light on the circumstan­ces of Brody’s death as required under the Coroners Act.

“The law has to be able to hold public officials accountabl­e when that pattern of abuse emerges,” Falconer said. “This needs and screams for accountabi­lity.”

 ?? MARK BLINCH, THE CANADIAN PRESS ?? Lawyer Julian Falconer: “The failure of coroners to attend death scenes in remote First Nations communitie­s is a pattern … of derelictio­n of duty.”
MARK BLINCH, THE CANADIAN PRESS Lawyer Julian Falconer: “The failure of coroners to attend death scenes in remote First Nations communitie­s is a pattern … of derelictio­n of duty.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada