Times Colonist

Victoria pledges $9,500 for legal challenge of Que. bill seen as discrimina­tory

- ROXANNE EGAN-ELLIOTT regan-elliott@timescolon­ist.com

The City of Victoria will join other Canadian municipali­ties in pledging financial support for a legal challenge of a Quebec bill that bans public-sector employees from wearing religious symbols at work.

Councillor­s voted Thursday to provide $9,500 to a legal appeal led by the National Council of Canadian Muslims and the Canadian Civil Liberties Associatio­n to strike down Bill 21, which bars public-sector workers deemed to hold positions of leadership, such as teachers and police officers, from wearing crosses, hijabs, turbans and other visible religious symbols.

The Canadian Civil Liberties Associatio­n says the bill “unfairly targets people who express their faith through what they wear.”

Passed in June 2019, the bill made headlines recently after a Quebec teacher said she was told she could no longer teach in a classroom because she wears a hijab.

Shortly after, Patrick Brown, mayor of Brampton, Ont., published a letter appealing to 100 Canadian mayors to fight against the bill.

Victoria joins Winnipeg and Ontario cities Brampton, Toronto, London, Milton, Markham and Whitby in pledging financial support, from $10,000 to $100,000. Other municipali­ties, such as Calgary, have condemned the legislatio­n but stopped short of contributi­ng funds.

“Although the Quebec government presented [the bill] as promoting religious neutrality of the state, it’s actually a thinly veiled attack on religious and cultural traditions of religious minorities,” said Coun. Sharmarke Dubow, who presented a motion to contribute up to $50,000 to the legal challenge, leaving the amount open to discussion.

Dubow told councillor­s he was given a copy of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms when he swore an oath to become a Canadian citizen in 2017, and he feels a responsibi­lity to protect and defend the rights enshrined in the Charter.

Reading the Charter is a reminder of “what we have and what we could lose” if Canadians don’t challenge the bill, which represents “textbook discrimina­tion,” Dubow said.

Councillor­s expressed unanimous opposition to Quebec’s legislatio­n and tried to agree on an appropriat­e financial contributi­on, suggesting amounts from $5,000 to $10,000.

Mayor Lisa Helps recommende­d $7,650 based on a rough per capita calculatio­n of the contributi­on made by a couple of cities.

“Part of the motion is send this to everybody in B.C. and ask them to contribute. We have to give them some basis to make a decision if we want them to come along with us,” Helps said, calling the bill “problemati­c legislatio­n” that particular­ly impacts people who are racialized and part of religious minorities.

That amount seemed to be supported by all councillor­s, including some who expressed concerns about allocating city money for matters outside Victoria.

“I don’t think this is going to receive general support in the public. However, I am going to vote in favour of spending this money, for a couple of reasons,” Coun. Stephen Andrew said of the $7,650 amount proposed. “Because I said at the beginning, if it’s an issue of human rights, then I would vote in favour of human rights and I believe that this is an issue.”

The vote split when councillor­s ultimately approved contributi­ng $9,500, an amount put forward by Coun. Ben Isitt to represent roughly 10 cents per resident. Councillor­s Andrew, Charlayne Thornton-Joe and Geoff Young voted in opposition to the final amount.

Before the final vote, Young said: “This has probably pushed me to the point where I’m not going to be able to support this, which, on balance as a symbolic action, I think I would have been prepared to, despite some misgivings.”

Part of the bill was struck down as unconstitu­tional last year by the Quebec Superior Court in a decision that recognized the harm to people who wear religious symbols but left most of the law intact.

The National Council of Canadian Muslims and the Canadian Civil Liberties Associatio­n have launched an appeal to the court’s decision.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada