Times Colonist

‘Non-negotiable’: Resources minister holds the line on Line 5 fuel pipeline

- JAMES McCARTEN

WASHINGTON — Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson is doubling down on Canada’s assertion that the continuing operation of the Line 5 pipeline is “non-negotiable.”

Wilkinson made the comments Friday in the House of Commons as Opposition MPs seized on media reports that the controvers­ial cross-border pipeline is facing yet another court challenge.

On top of efforts by the state of Michigan to shut down Line 5, an Indigenous band in Wisconsin is now asking a judge there to do the same.

The Bad River Band of Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa argues in court documents that Enbridge Inc., the pipeline’s owner, no longer has the right to operate on its territory.

Fifteen of the 20-year easements that allowed the company to operate on band territory expired back in 2013 and were never properly renewed, they argue in court documents.

“Enbridge has continued to operate the pipeline as if it has an indefinite entitlemen­t to do so,” say the documents, firstrepor­ted by the Globe and Mail.

“This constitute­s an unlawful possession of the subject lands, and an intentiona­l, ongoing trespass upon them.”

The band filed a motion in February seeking a summary judgment against Enbridge — in other words, to shut down Line 5 without a trial.

“The continued operation of Line 5 is non-negotiable,” Wilkinson said Friday in response to a question from Conservati­ve MP John Brassard.

“We will take appropriat­e steps to ensure the continued safe operation of this critical infrastruc­ture. And we continue to work closely with the owner of Line 5.”

Wilkinson said he will continue to raise the matter in discussion­s with his U.S. counterpar­ts. Federal officials say the minister will be in D.C. for meetings on a number of bilateral issues in the coming days, potentiall­y as early as next week.

The Conservati­ves, however, want the government to take a harder line, urging Foreign Affairs Minister Mélanie Joly to intervene in the Wisconsin case the same way they did in Michigan: with an amicus brief to put Canada’s economic interests on the record.

Enbridge, meanwhile, is in the process of trying to relocate the pipeline away from band territory, said spokesman Jesse Semko, adding that a 1992 agreement with the Bad River Band allows for operations to continue until 2043.

That relocation project will involve a Wisconsin contractor and union and Indigenous labour, as well as $46 million spent specifical­ly on Indigenous businesses and communitie­s in the area, Semko said.

“Agreement has been reached with 100 per cent of private landowners along the re-route, which was chosen because it minimizes environmen­tal impacts and protects critical resources.”

 ?? DALE G. YOUNG, DETROIT NEWS VIA CP ?? Enbridge’s Line 5 pipeline has faced political opposition and court challenges as the company tries to keep the vital oil and natural gas pipeline in operation.
DALE G. YOUNG, DETROIT NEWS VIA CP Enbridge’s Line 5 pipeline has faced political opposition and court challenges as the company tries to keep the vital oil and natural gas pipeline in operation.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada