Helicopter firm challenges air ambulance contract
A division of the world’s largest helicopter manufacturer is contesting the B.C. government’s air ambulance contract with a Parksville company.
Airbus Helicopters Canada Ltd. filed a petition in B.C. Supreme Court in November against B.C. Emergency Health Services (BCEHS), which awarded Ascent Helicopters Ltd. the $544.5-million contract last May. The petition also names Michael Schenkers, procurement manager for the Provincial Health Services Authority (PHSA). The Fort Erie, Ont.-based arm of the French aerospace giant wants a judge to quash the deal; it alleges PHSA preferred helicopters made by competitor Leonardo “on the basis of undisclosed criteria.”
“Airbus informed and supported the bids of many of the operators that participated in a competitive procurement process conducted by PHSA to procure Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) with several carriers indicating that the H145 was the leading helicopter in their proposals,” said the Airbus petition, filed by Brook Greenberg of the Fasken law firm. “The decision to select the AW169 over the H145 was procedurally unfair, since the PHSA has not provided reasons or rationale for the helicopter decision.”
Schenkers declined comment. None of the allegations have been proven in court and the province has yet to respond.
In 2021, BCEHS issued a request for proposals for rotary-wing air ambulance operators to provide air ambulance services under an eight-year contract, with two optional twoyear extensions. The contract to transfer critically ill patients between hospitals and respond to emergency medical calls is currently held by Helijet International of Richmond and Summit Helicopters of Kamloops.
Ascent will become the first Canadian air ambulance operation relying on the Leonardo AW169 when it imports seven helicopters from the Italian company. The contract is expected to start by the end of the year.
Airbus claimed that proponents were required to submit fixed price proposals that are not based on volume of hours actually provided. Airbus also claimed that, prior to making its decision, BCEHS told operators that it preferred the AW169.
“As a result, for example, Ascent submitted a separate proposal with the AW169 late within the [request for proposals] process, despite Ascent’s lead proposal being for the H145,” said the Airbus filing. “By preferring a model of helicopter even prior to receiving proposals from the operators, and effectively prejudging the helicopter decision, BCEHS and PHSA unlawfully fettered their discretion in conducting the RFP.”