Times Colonist

Review: Cena gets the laughs in middling comedy Ricky Stanicky

- LINDSEY BAHR

Your tolerance for the new Peter Farrelly comedy Ricky Stanicky might come down to whether you think the idea of accidental­ly miming a certain sex act is funny.

The concept is of little consequenc­e to the plot. It’s something that a few of the leads notice that the buttoned-up leader of a financial company (William H. Macy) does when he makes speeches. They decide that’s why he’s unable to close a deal, giving it a name that is repeated so many times it could be a new drinking game. The movie thinks this is just comedy gold. You might, too.

Ricky Stanicky (it is meant to rhyme) is a name chosen in haste by three pre-teen boys who have just accidental­ly lit a house on fire. They didn’t mean to commit arson, they simply wanted to burn some dog poop on the doorstep of a house that didn’t give out any Halloween candy. When the fire gets out of control, they leave behind a jacket with a fake name inscribed in it: Ricky Stanicky. He becomes their imaginary fourth friend and forever fall guy, even into adulthood (in which they’re played by Zac Efron, Andrew Santino and Jermaine Fowler). But their house of alibis is in danger of crumbling when suspicious partners and one nagging mother-in-law demand that the elusive Ricky materializ­e. So, the guys decide to hire a washed up Atlantic City celebrity impression­ist who goes by “Rock Hard” Rod (John Cena) to play Ricky for a day.

This idea did not originate with Farrelly, who, of course, with his brother defined a moment in broad 1990s comedy with movies such as Dumb & Dumber, Kingpin and There’s Something About Mary. The sensibilit­y was always more than a bit juvenile — but done so gleefully and with such unabashed commitment that it was hard not to just laugh along with the antics. Some of their comedies have aged poorly, a fate that is not unique to them, but again, they were of a moment that long ago passed (they were like the younger, sweeter sibling of the frat guy mentality of the early aughts).

And unfortunat­ely, Ricky Stanicky feels like one of those lesser 2000 comedies that wanted so badly to be There’s Something About Mary. It makes a certain amount of sense when you consider that the script has been circling Hollywood for about 15 years. At one point, James Franco was attached to the title role. A few years later, it was going to be Jim Carrey. This developmen­t journey is one of the reasons why there are six credited screenwrit­ers on the version that finally got made (Jeff Bushell and Brian Jarvis and James Lee Freeman and Peter Farrelly and Pete Jones and Mike Cerrone). It’s impossible to tell where the (I assume) good ended and the bad started to creep in, but six names are rarely a good sign in writing credits.

It has stamps of a Farrelly romp — a bit with a dog and a duck, a little accidental drugging, a comedic circumcisi­on — but little of the charm. Is this, perhaps, a piece of comedy that should have been made when it was written? Was it doomed to be revived for 2024 audiences?

One of the problems is that it is filmed with all the artfulness of a yogurt commercial. Everything looks like a set. Everyone looks like an actor. The women are all surface. Nothing seems remotely real, ever, not even the blindingly bright lighting.

The one bright spot is Cena, who is quite good. Like his character, who goes above and beyond to adeptly play Ricky Stanicky, Cena really and truly commits and brings a kind of unexpected depth and pathos to Rock Hard Rod. He’s flexed his comedy muscles before and should again, soon.

Is it enough to save the movie? Not for me.

 ?? AMAZON VIA AP ?? William H. Macy in a scene from Ricky Stanicky.
AMAZON VIA AP William H. Macy in a scene from Ricky Stanicky.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada