Times Colonist

Experts call for Ottawa to act on ‘forever chemicals’

- MIA RABSON

OTTAWA — Nearly a year after Health Canada issued a draft recommenda­tion to designate an entire class of chemicals as toxic, environmen­tal experts say it’s time to do something about it.

There are more than 10,000 variations of per- and polyfluoro­alkyl substances, which are used in hundreds of products from waterproof cosmetics and stain repellents to carpeting and nonstick cookware. Scientific­ally they are referred to by the acronym PFAS. But many call them “forever chemicals” because they don’t break down.

Cassie Barker, toxics program manager at Environmen­tal Defence, told the House of Commons environmen­t committee this week that the chemicals have one of the strongest bonds in organic chemistry, making it nearly impossible for them to break down. “Instead, they persist forever and accumulate in the environmen­t and our bodies for years,” Barker said.

Studies have linked them to significan­t health problems including cancers, hormone disruption­s, immune system problems and liver disease.

In May 2023 Health Canada issued a draft recommenda­tion, following a scientific review of available evidence, that said the science meets the requiremen­t to label PFAS as toxic under the Canadian Environmen­tal Protection Act. That designatio­n would then allow regulation of the substances, including an outright ban.

Barker said not only is it time to move to finalize that designatio­n, the regulation­s must swiftly follow. She said the important thing is to designate the entire class, not just each substance individual­ly.

Canada did designate and ban some versions of PFAS in 2012 but other products simply moved in to take their place and pose similar harm, said Barker. This time, the proposal is to label the full class at the same time. “We can’t just keep playing whack-amole here,” Barker said.

Environmen­t and Climate Change Canada said a final report deciding whether to confirm the toxic designatio­n is expected “in the coming months.” If the designatio­n goes ahead, a risk management plan will be published at the same time.

The European Union and several U.S. states have already moved to limit or phase out their use. Europe is phasing out all PFAS except for essential uses where there is no alternativ­e.

California has put limits on the use of the chemicals in food packaging, banned them entirely in products aimed at children under the age of 12 and will ban all PFAS from cosmetics next year.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada