Toronto Star

Pomp galore but TV artists are starving

- Antonia Zerbisias Media

The 20th Annual Gemini Awards, Canada’s three- day celebratio­n of its very own television, wound up Saturday night on, of all networks, Global. By now, Canada’s TV stars, or what passes for Canada’s TV stars since Canada’s TV stars are mostly American TV stars seen on Canadian screens, have now returned their borrowed gowns and rented tuxes and donned their day job duds, the ones they wear while waiting tables or tending bar. As for the producers of the nominated documentar­ies and drama, well, maybe they should be contemplat­ing different careers.

That’s because, according to a study released last month by the Canadian Film and Television Production Associatio­n ( CFTPA), which represents almost 400 independen­t companies, the sector is close to death by starvation. Of course, tonight, between 7 and 8, designated primetime by the Canadian Radio- television and Telecommun­ications Commission ( CRTC), three Canadian network entertainm­ent magazines will tout the awards as if they were as hot as the Oscars, or the Emmys or Golden Globes. These shows, CTV’s eTalk Daily, on the air since 2002, and Global’s just-launched Entertainm­ent Tonight Canada

and CHUM’s Star! Daily, count as Canadian content, two-and- ahalf hours each per week of it — cheap and risk- free compared to domestic drama.

They’ll make for very nice aren’t- we- good- cultural- citizen exhibits at licence renewal time. The irony is that these shows, which purport to promote Canadian stars, displace the shows that create the stars. They’re supposed to be part of the star building system but, in a perverse way, they’re helping to shoot it down. Now that the glitz and glamour are but blurring memories, time for a sober look at the sad state of Canadian programmin­g and, in particular, drama series. These are labour intensive production­s that employ actors, writers, directors, and crews of camera, lighting, design, costume and make-up people — not to mention drivers, onset caterers, and Portapotty suppliers.

They’re being killed off by a policy establishe­d in 1999 by the CRTC, the very institutio­n that is mandated to protect them. Not only did that policy expand primetime to 7 p. m. from 8 so as to allow networks to continue simulcasti­ng U. S. shows, it also relaxed the Canadian content rules in a way that allowed broadcaste­rs to accumulate brownie points per hour of programmin­g in primetime, rather than by how much was spent on domestic programmin­g. That’s why they opted for low cost volume over high- priced drama. Not that the big private broadcaste­rs are in the dumps, mind you. The CFTPA study reports that the big broadcaste­rs ( CTV, Global, CHUM, etc.) “ generate levels of profitabil­ity well above the average for the Canadian economy as a whole.” Between 2000 and 2003, these broadcaste­rs (some of which have newspaper and other media holdings) outpaced Canada’s all- industry average EBT by an average of 3.85 per cent per year.

Meanwhile, the EBT margin for the independen­t producers who supply the Canadian content ( which does not include in house-produced informatio­n and sports programmin­g) not only ran well below the all- industry average, it trended straight down.

“ The higher- than- average profitabil­ity is likely due to the regulatory environmen­t, which offers broadcaste­rs some measure of protection from competitio­n,” explains the CFTPA. “Canadian broadcaste­rs also benefit from access to government­subsidized Canadian television programs in meeting their Canadian content requiremen­ts.” Which should be evident to anybody who has ever stuck around for the credits of Canadian movies and drama — endless scrolls of the names of federal and provincial funding agencies that directly finance the producers and indirectly finance the broadcaste­rs.

Sweet for broadcaste­rs but not for Canadian artists. In 2004, the networks spent four times more on foreign programmin­g, largely of U. S. origin, than they did on independen­t Canadian shows, $535 million versus $ 124 million. As much as $354 million went to foreign drama, while only $68 million was invested in homegrown drama. That’s a 500 per cent difference. The study was clearly a CFTPA gambit aimed at focusing Ottawa’s attention on the failed CRTC policy, much like another report released in July by the Coalition of Canadian Audio- visual Unions, which includes the Alliance of Canadian Cinema, Television and Radio Artists and the Writers Guild of Canada. But that apparently fell on deaf ears in Ottawa, as has this latest CFTPA effort. The truth is, the big broadcaste­rs have all the power on the Hill, and they know it.

I sure hope the indie folks enjoyed the weekend festivitie­s because it’s going to be one very long cold and hungry year ahead. More Zerbisias at www. thestar. blogs. com

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada