Toronto Star

U.S. rejects bid for post-Kyoto talks

Impasse over Dion’s proposal Americans deem it inappropri­ate

- PETER GORRIE STAFF REPORTER WITH FILES FROM PETER CALAMAI AND STAR WIRE SERVICES

MONTREAL— The climate change conference hit a major roadblock yesterday when the United States rejected even a watereddow­n proposal for future talks on cutting greenhouse gas emissions. The impasse came on the same day as news that a small community in the Pacific island chain of Vanuatu has been moved to avoid rising seawater attributed to the warming of the atmosphere by those gases. The proposal, introduced by Environmen­t Minister Stéphane Dion as president of the United Nations conference, calls only for two years of discussion­s on “ long- term co- operative action to address climate change.”

It was designed to be vague enough to appeal to the U. S., which adamantly rejects any hint of a move that might require it to accept mandatory targets for cutting greenhouse gas emissions. It makes no reference to targets and carefully refers only to discussion­s, with no mention of negotiatio­ns. Even so, the United States said it was inappropri­ate, because discussion­s could lead to negotiatio­ns.

“ Formalized processes . . . ( such as Dion proposes) are, in fact, negotiatio­ns,” Harlan Watson, alternate head of the U. S. delegation, said earlier in the two- week conference. That “ remains consistent with our position,” an American official said yesterday.

“This is extraordin­ary. The ( Dion) proposal was absolutely meaningles­s in the first place,” said Phil Clapp, president of the New York- based National Environmen­tal Trust. The plan is a crucial half of the so-called “ two- track” plan to cut emissions after the first phase of the Kyoto protocol ends in 2012. Canada and 39 other “ developed” countries face mandatory targets in the first phase and are negotiatin­g steps toward deeper cuts. The U. S. isn’t part of the talks as it rejects the protocol.

Dion’s plan is the second track, aimed at getting all countries here to start work on other future measures. The U. S. has a veto. Failure of Dion’s plan would make it much harder to get agreement on the deeper cuts. What remains to be seen is whether Canada, Europe and others will agree to weaken it further to appease the Americans or accept arguments the conference should go ahead without them.

In his only public appearance — kicking off a day devoted to culture, celebratio­ns and speeches by aboriginal peoples from across the Arctic — Dion brushed by reporters. Other delegation­s refused comment.

Dion’s plan would help a little in the battle to curb climate change, said John Drexhage, executive director of the WinnipegIn­ternationa­l Institute for Sustainabl­e Developmen­t. But it can’t be weakened further, he said. “ This is the rock bottom for it to have any significan­ce at all.”

“ It’s an unending seminar on climate change,” Clapp said. “ We’re past the point at which unending seminars are appropriat­e. It’s time to abandon efforts to win co- operation from the Bush administra­tion and get on with the real job of reducing emissions.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada