MORE CONTROVERSY: Speedy street repair just one problem,

Under fire over his use of his office to help his football teams, Mayor Rob Ford faced more accusations of improper behaviour Thursday regarding road repairs outside his family company’s building. Full story, GT4. A summary of his ongoing controversies: THE ISSUE: In July, Ford asked city officials to fix the road and drainage near Deco Labels and Tags. Policy in question: Council’s Code of Conduct provision against “improper use of influence.” Ford’s response: His spokesperson says the company didn’t get special treatment. Repercussions: None to date. THE ISSUE: In February, Ford urged council to excuse him from paying back lobbyists’ improper donations to his foundation. He then cast a vote to excuse himself. Policy in question: The Municipal Conflict of Interest Act, which says members of council can’t debate or vote on issues in which they have a financial interest. Ford’s response: Ford offered an unusual definition of a conflict of interest: “The city has to benefit and a member of council has to benefit.” His lawyer says council had no authority to force repayment and that Ford made an honest mistake if he did err. Repercussions: A resident filed a lawsuit that could cost Ford his job. THE ISSUE: In 2010, Ford’s campaign allowed a family company to pay for $77,722.31 in expenses. Policy in question: The Municipal Elections Act, which says loans must be from a “bank or other recognized lending institution.” Ford’s response: His lawyer says the company was a supplier, not a lender. Repercussions: Campaign finances are being audited. Ford could face MEA charges. THE ISSUE: Ford aides have assisted his football teams using a taxpayer-funded car. Policy in question: The Code of Conduct rule against using city staff or resources for personal business. Ford’s response: His office said staffers put in full work weeks. Ford said, “I haven’t been using my office resources.” Repercussions: Resident filed a complaint with the integrity commissioner. Daniel Dale