Toronto Star

Door closes for many refugees

Ottawa tightens rules for those coming from ‘safe’ countries

- NICHOLAS KEUNG IMMIGRATIO­N REPORTER

Asylum seekers from 23 countries would be presumed “unfounded refugees” and stripped of their appeal rights under changes to the refugee system that take effect in December.

Based on 2012 asylum data, these countries — including the Czech Republic, Hungary and Mexico — meet the criteria set out by Immigratio­n Minister Jason Kenney on Friday to designate them as safe and capable of protecting their own nationals.

Under the new system, refugees from Kenney’s designated countries — to be revealed Dec. 15, when the changes take effect — will have their claims fast-tracked and heard within 30 to 45 days without access to the newly-establishe­d appeal mechanism and be booted out of Canada in a year.

They are also banned from working in Canada unless their claim has been in the system for more than 180 days and no decision has been made, and are ineligible for health care coverage, even for medical emergencie­s.

“Our system took so long to get around to removing false claimants, unfounded claimants who did not actually need our protection and in some cases, were seeking to abuse Canada’s generosity,” Kenney said Friday.

“We believe the new system . . . will substantia­lly reduce the attractive­ness of making unfounded claims and will therefore allow us to focus our resources more on the bona fide refugees who actually do need our protection.”

Refugee advocates warn that some of the countries that may be deemed safe have questionab­le human rights records and broadbrush­ing claimants by their country of origin risks overlookin­g the individual risks they face.

“It is flawed, unfair and discrimina­tory,” said Alex Neve, Secretary General of Amnesty Internatio­nal Canada.

“In many countries that seem peaceful and safe, particular minority groups face serious problems of persecutio­n, discrimina­tion and violence.” JANET DENCH CANADIAN COUNCIL FOR REFUGEES

According to Kenney, countries will be put under review for designatio­n if their combined rejection, withdrawal and abandonmen­t rate of asylum claims exceeds 75 per cent or when their withdrawn and abandoned caseload goes over 60 per cent.

They must also log a minimum of 30 claims a year. However, a country is not automatica­lly designated by meeting these thresholds. It will also be assessed by various federal government department­s based on its democratic governance, human rights records, respect for freedoms and rule of law. The immigratio­n minister has the final say as to which country is safe. “In many countries that seem peaceful and safe, particular minority groups face serious problems of persecutio­n, discrimina­tion and violence, often with the participat­ion of state officials,” said Janet Dench of the Canadian Council for Refugees. “The eliminatio­n of proposed expert oversight mechanisms for designatin­g countries, previously accepted by the government, renders Canada’s system of independen­t decision-making for refugees vulnerable to political, trade, military, diplomatic and other considerat­ions.” In 2011, Canada accepted 38 per cent or 12,983 of the 34,257 asylum claims it processed, and rejected 47 per cent or 16,122 cases. While 5 per cent of the claimants disappeare­d and abandoned their cases, 10 per cent of them asked to have their claims withdrawn. Kenney estimated that a quarter of the new claims made after Dec.15 will be from designated safe countries.

 ?? SEAN KILPATRICK/THE CANADIAN PRESS ?? Immigratio­n Minister Jason Kenney will have the final say on which countries are deemed safe under changes to the refugee system.
SEAN KILPATRICK/THE CANADIAN PRESS Immigratio­n Minister Jason Kenney will have the final say on which countries are deemed safe under changes to the refugee system.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada