Toronto Star

The Tories have changed Canada in no time at all

- TIM HARPER

OTTAWA— The Conservati­ve majority turned two Thursday. Hold the cake.

For all its carefully-crafted imagery as the stay-the-course, steadyas-she goes government, Stephen Harper’s Conservati­ves have reshaped much of this country in 24 short months.

From the environmen­t to health care to foreign policy, this is a different Canada than it was May 2, 2011, and many of the Harper initiative­s may not be easily undone by future government­s, or even future leaders of a Conservati­ve government.

In some cases, this government has been remarkably up front about its plans to hobble any future government­s, most notably in its decision to destroy data from the long gun registry, now a thing of the past everywhere but Quebec which is fighting for its data in court.

But it will clearly be difficult to undo a series of environmen­tal measures, including streamline­d regulatory reviews, formal withdrawal from the Kyoto protocol, the radical overhaul of the Navigable Waters Act and the Fisheries Act, plus the uncertaint­y over the future of the Experiment­al Lakes Area, the freshwater research centre, in northern Ontario.

It shuttered the National Round Table on the Environmen­t and the Economy and then spurned its offer to keep its research in the public domain. NDP Leader Tom Mulcair told my colleague Joanna Smith recently that because of these measures, “environmen­tal degradatio­n” could become permanent, but Bob Rae, who presided over the Liberals for most of the two years, believes nothing is irreversib­le for a new government.

Some of the change is profound, nonetheles­s.

The two-year-old government has cut scientific research, muzzled its scientists, put limits on the independen­ce of Statistics Canada and is facing charges that it plans to wield more influence over the CBC.

Harper has abdicated the federal role in setting national health-care policy in this country, a radical break from convention in which the federal government provided the cash and left the delivery to the provinces.

In fact, Harper has essentiall­y ended group consultati­ons with premiers in any form, meeting with them one-on-one and eschewing the grand federal-provincial conference­s of yore.

Quietly, this government has also reshaped the Employment Insurance program, pushing the unemployed to uproot and accept jobs at less pay, a move that has faced stiff criticism in Atlantic Canada, if a more muted response elsewhere. It has changed the age at which Canadians are eligible for Old Age Security, but pushed those changes past the next election, and the NDP has pledged to roll back the measure. It has had organized labour, using the shorthand “big union bosses,” in its crosshairs since the 2011 election, quickly legislatin­g workers back on the job when it can, even passing back-to-work legislatio­n before there was a job disruption. It quickly passed a private member’s bill — now stalled in the Senate — which forces unions to account for their spending on behalf of its members, including all lobbying and political activities, and there is a thirst for federal right-towork legislatio­n among some MPs in the government caucus. Under the guise of standing tall for taxpayers, the government, in its most recent budget bill, has signalled its intention to have a treasury board representa­tive at the table during upcoming contract negotiatio­ns at the supposedly arms-length VIA Rail, Canada Post and the CBC. But some of the biggest changes in two years under the Harper government have been our place in the world. Canada’s lockstep support for Israel and its noisy bid to undermine Palestinia­n observerst­ate status at the UN has removed from Ottawa any pretense of a voice searching for common ground in the Middle East. Its disdain for the UN in general, and some of its programs — we are the only country in the world to pull out of a UN convention that combats drought in Africa — and the sudden severing of ties with Iran have been noted globally. This week, Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird bluntly stated the country has better things to do than seek a seat on the UN Security Council, the seat denied to them in 2010.

It has rolled CIDA into the foreign affairs department, aligning our trade and foreign policy with our aid objectives.

All of the above took a mere two years. It is also reads like a blueprint for continued support from the party base. As it turns the corner on this mandate, the real test will be how the Conservati­ves try to reach beyond that base heading to 2015. Tim Harper is a national affairs writer. His column appears Monday, Wednesday and Friday. tharper@thestar.ca Twitter:@nutgraf1

 ?? LUCAS JACKSON/REUTERS ?? This week, Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird, seen speaking at the UN in October 2012, said the country has better things to do than seek a seat on the UN Security Council. Canada was denied a seat in 2010.
LUCAS JACKSON/REUTERS This week, Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird, seen speaking at the UN in October 2012, said the country has better things to do than seek a seat on the UN Security Council. Canada was denied a seat in 2010.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada