Toronto Star

‘This does not mean I am finished with life’

Oliver Sacks on learning he has terminal cancer,

-

A month ago, I felt that I was in good health, even robust health. At 81, I still swim a mile a day. But my luck has run out — a few weeks ago I learned that I have multiple metastases in the liver.

Nine years ago it was discovered that I had a rare tumour of the eye, an ocular melanoma. Although the radiation and lasering to remove the tumour ultimately left me blind in that eye, only in very rare cases do such tumours metastasiz­e. I am among the unlucky 2 per cent.

I feel grateful that I have been granted nine years of good health and productivi­ty since the original diagnosis, but now I am face to face with dying. The cancer occupies a third of my liver, and though its advance may be slowed, this particular sort of cancer cannot be halted.

It is up to me now to choose how to live out the months that remain to me. I have to live in the richest, deepest, most productive way I can. In this I am encouraged by the words of one of my favourite philosophe­rs, David Hume, who, upon learning that he was mortally ill at age 65, wrote a short autobiogra­phy in a single day in April of 1776. He titled it “My Own Life.” Reactions to Oliver Sacks’s essay “I now reckon upon a speedy dissolutio­n,” he wrote. “I have suffered very little pain from my disorder; and what is more strange, have, notwithsta­nding the great decline of my person, never suffered a moment’s abatement of my spirits. I possess the same ardour as ever in study, and the same gaiety in company.”

I have been lucky enough to live past 80, and the 15 years allotted to me beyond Hume’s three score and five have been equally rich in work and love. In that time, I have published five books and completed an autobiogra­phy (rather longer than Hume’s few pages) to be published this spring; I have several other books nearly finished. Hume continued, “I am … a man of mild dispositio­ns, of command of temper, of an open, social, and cheerful humour, capable of attachment, but little susceptibl­e of enmity, and of great moderation in all my passions.”

Here I depart from Hume. While I have enjoyed loving relationsh­ips and friendship­s and have no real enmities, I cannot say (nor would anyone who knows me say) that I am a man of mild dispositio­ns. On the contrary, I am a man of vehement dispositio­n, with violent enthusi- asms, and extreme immoderati­on in all my passions.

And yet, one line from Hume’s essay strikes me as especially true: “It is difficult,” he wrote, “to be more detached from life than I am at present.”

Over the last few days, I have been able to see my life as from a great altitude, as a sort of landscape, and with a deepening sense of the connection of all its parts. This does not mean I am finished with life.

On the contrary, I feel intensely alive, and I want and hope in the time that remains to deepen my friendship­s, to say farewell to those I love, to write more, to travel if I have the strength, to achieve new levels of understand­ing and insight.

This will involve audacity, clarity and plain speaking; trying to straighten my accounts with the world. But there will be time, too, for some fun (and even some silliness, as well).

I feel a sudden clear focus and perspectiv­e. There is no time for anything inessentia­l. I must focus on myself, my work and my friends. I shall no longer look at NewsHour every night. I shall no longer pay any attention to politics or arguments about global warming.

This is not indifferen­ce but detachment — I still care deeply about the Middle East, about global warming, about growing inequality, but these are no longer my business; they belong to the future. I rejoice when I meet gifted young people — even the one who biopsied and diagnosed my metastases. I feel the future is in good hands.

I have been increasing­ly conscious, for the last 10 years or so, of deaths among my contempora­ries. My generation is on the way out, and each death I have felt as an abruption, a tearing away of part of myself.

There will be no one like us when we are gone, but then there is no one like anyone else, ever. When people die, they cannot be replaced. They leave holes that cannot be filled, for it is the fate — the genetic and neural fate — of every human being to be a unique individual, to find his own path, to live his own life, to die his own death.

I cannot pretend I am without fear. But my predominan­t feeling is one of gratitude. I have loved and been loved; I have been given much and I have given something in return; I have read and travelled and thought and written. I have had an intercours­e with the world, the special intercours­e of writers and readers.

Above all, I have been a sentient being, a thinking animal, on this beautiful planet, and that in itself has been an enormous privilege and adventure. This piece was originally published in the New York Times.

 ??  ??
 ?? ADAM SCOURFIELD/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILE PHOTO ?? Oliver Sacks, a neurologis­t, has made a career of writing about his patients. Lately, he has turned his gaze inward.
ADAM SCOURFIELD/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILE PHOTO Oliver Sacks, a neurologis­t, has made a career of writing about his patients. Lately, he has turned his gaze inward.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada